Search for: "Head v State" Results 5181 - 5200 of 14,740
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2017, 12:30 pm by EEM
Handshake, was Given Handcuffs Instead," New York Times, 13 June 2017 [text]"Trump and Chinese Exclusion: Contemporary Parallels with Legislative Debates over the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882," Tennessee Law Review, vol. 84 (Forthcoming, 2017) [preprint]"Trump Seeks to Reopen Cases of Hundreds Reprieved from Deportation," The Guardian, 9 June 2017 [text]UN Refugee Agency Head Pleads for Funding from Trump Administration (The Hill, June 2017) [text]“Us Versus… [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 11:00 am
 Because I'm not a moron, and have also been an attorney for a quarter century now, and even I can't fully follow the Ninth Circuit's explanation today as to what it means (or what we have to tell a jury) when we say that someone who ships firearms from one state to another may be acting in "willful"violation of the law.If even someone like me can't fully understand what we're saying, how in God's Green Earth can we expect a jury of laypeople… [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 6:47 am by Chris Castle
 The required “Content” of an NOI is stated in the regulations is: (d) Content. (1) A Notice of Intention shall be clearly and prominently designated, at the head of the notice, as a “Notice of Intention to Obtain a Compulsory License for Making and Distributing Phonorecords,” and shall include a clear statement of the following information…. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
As the Supreme Court observed in the context of high school students in Tinker v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am by John Elwood
” United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 7:08 am by Joy Waltemath
In suspending the entry of more than 180 million nationals from six countries, suspending entry of all refugees, and reducing the annual cap on the admission of refugees from 110,000 to 50,000, the president did not meet the essential precondition of making a sufficient finding that the entry of those classes of people would be “detrimental to the interests of the United States” (State of Hawaii v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 9:21 am by Matthew Kahn
Quinta Jurecic posted the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Hawaii v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 1:20 pm by Alex Potcovaru
Speaking at the press conference, Trump reaffirmed Article V of NATO, committing the United States to the alliance’s promise of collective self-defense. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
X v Attorney-General The Jameel doctrine got a further head of steam just eleven days after Katz J’s judgment, when Simon France J struck out several pleaded ‘reputational claims’. [read post]