Search for: "Jones v State"
Results 5181 - 5200
of 6,149
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Moore, No. 06-1082 In a case raising the issue of whether a police officer violates the Fourth Amendment by making an arrest based on probable cause but prohibited by state law, the Supreme Court rules that warrantless arrests for crimes committed in the presence of an arresting officer are reasonable under the Constitution, and that while states are free to regulate such arrests however they desire, state restrictions do not alter the Fourth Amendment's protections. … [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 2:30 am
On 12 December 2012, the Court of Appeal (Arden and Lloyd-Jones LJJ and Tugendhat J) handed down judgment in Cammish v Hughes ([2012] EWCA Civ 1655). [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 7:23 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 3:37 pm
The settlement resolves a class action lawsuit, Hutchinson v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:47 pm
Schlumberger Technology Corporation v. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 4:18 pm
Canada In the case of R v Jones 2017 SCC 60, the Supreme Court held that text messages may attract a reasonable expectation of privacy even after they have been sent and received. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:55 am
Immunity of Expert Witnesses For civil practitioners, one of the most interesting and potentially far reaching decisions of the term was Jones v Kaney [2011] UKSC 13. [read post]
5 May 2008, 4:52 pm
Harlow v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 7:28 pm
United States, 440 U.S. 48, 55, 99 S.Ct. 914, 918, 59 L.Ed.2d 136 (1979); Matter of Jones, 768 F.2d 923, 927 (7th Cir.1985). [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 8:52 am
However, in 2012, the Court decided in United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 2:37 pm
And yet, following the DC Circuit's decision in United States v Maynard (which eventually became United States v Jones when it was decided by the Supreme Court), individual jurists and scholars have increasingly embraced a mosaic theory of the Fourth Amendment, under which a discrete action (watching someone in public, seeking their phone records via a grand jury subpoena) becomes unconstitutional when government officials engage in that action too… [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 1:01 pm
Pineda-Moreno, a Ninth Circuit case that could play a significant role in determining how broadly the Supreme Court's recent GPS tracking decision, United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 1:24 am
Jones, 529 U.S. at 856 (quoting Russell v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 9:44 am
Instead, it points to the Supreme Court’s 1974 decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 3:16 am
” In an op-ed in the Denver Post, Joseph Smith Jr. weighs in on Endrew F. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 12:48 pm
Absent a specific assurance of adequacy, insurers do not have a general duty to investigate and inform the insured of adequacy of coverage, Jones v. [read post]
10 Nov 2018, 2:32 pm
This decision was affirmed by the Florida Supreme court in Rupp v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 5:57 am
Davidson and Jones, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 6:48 am
The New Jersey Supreme Court has recognized the right to be left alone in State v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Trademark Review and Appraisal Board of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce of the People’s Republic of China (China Blawg) Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People's Court: TRAB ordered to re-decide TUAN TOURAN review application: Volkswagen Inc v Trademark Review And Appraisal Board Of The State Administration For Industry And Commerce Of The People’s Republic Of China (China Blawg) Just Do It? [read post]
