Search for: "LAWS v. DAVIS" Results 5181 - 5200 of 6,275
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2013, 9:30 pm by Peter M. Shane
Davis II Chair in Law, Moritz College of Law, Ohio State University. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:33 pm by John Elwood
 CVSG: 5/18/2023 (relisted after the June 22 conference) Davis v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:18 am by Gabriel Chin
The Supreme Court heard argument on Monday by telephone in Pham v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Courts have often expressed—as the Supreme Court did in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 6:42 am
DiNapoli, Office of New York State Comptroller, on Sunday, June 16, 2019 Tags: Climate change, Environmental disclosure, ESG, Institutional Investors, New York, Pension funds, Stewardship, Sustainability Mootness Fees Posted by Steven Davidoff Solomon (University of California, Berkeley), on Monday, June 17, 2019 Tags: Class actions, Delaware law, Disclosure, Fairness review, Merger litigation, Mergers… [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
Supreme Court subsequently appointed a guardian for plaintiff pursuant Mental Hygiene Law 81. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) False marking and patent reform (Patently-O)   US Patents Patent marking police strike again - 100 companies now affected by false marking suits (GRAY on Claims) The marking requirement: Here is how the statute has been interpreted (Patently-O) Investigating Patent Law’s presumption of validity - An empirical analysis (Patently-O) Inventors Eye: The Patent Office’s new publication for inventors (Patent Baristas)   US Patents –… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) False marking and patent reform (Patently-O)   US Patents Patent marking police strike again - 100 companies now affected by false marking suits (GRAY on Claims) The marking requirement: Here is how the statute has been interpreted (Patently-O) Investigating Patent Law’s presumption of validity - An empirical analysis (Patently-O) Inventors Eye: The Patent Office’s new publication for inventors (Patent Baristas)   US Patents –… [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:56 am by Kathy Kapusta
Reviving her suit for a second time, the appeals court reversed summary judgment and remanded (Davis v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Superior Court (Environmental Law Foundation), ___ Cal.App.4th ___, 2013 Cal. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 7:49 am by Carlton Larson
Larson is Professor of Law at the University of California-Davis School of Law. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) BPAI uses dictionary published six years after filing date in rejecting claims: Ex Parte Davis (Gray on Claims) BPAI rejects claims, finding PHOSITA would have to make speculative assumptions concerning the meaning of claim language: Ex parte Brune (Gray on Claims) ITC reverses Remand Initial Determination and finds no violation in investigation relating to coolants brought by INEOS against Sinochem (ITC 337 Law Blog)… [read post]