Search for: "Price v. Price" Results 5181 - 5200 of 18,084
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In contrast, said the court, where the language in the collective bargaining agreement "is 'reasonably susceptible of more than one interpretation, extrinsic or parol evidence may be then permitted to determine the parties' intent as to the meaning of that language,'" referencing Fernandez v Price, 63 AD3d 672 quoting Chimart Assoc. v Paul, 66 NY2d 570.In this instance the Appellate Division concluded that Supreme Court "properly… [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 5:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The price of free expression and of political opposition within a union cannot be the risk of expulsion or other disciplinary action. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 4:51 am by Jon Hyman
The issue will resolve tension between two Supreme Court opinions: Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In contrast, said the court, where the language in the collective bargaining agreement "is 'reasonably susceptible of more than one interpretation, extrinsic or parol evidence may be then permitted to determine the parties' intent as to the meaning of that language,'" referencing Fernandez v Price, 63 AD3d 672 quoting Chimart Assoc. v Paul, 66 NY2d 570.In this instance the Appellate Division concluded that Supreme Court "properly… [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 2:00 am by John Day
 In a land sale transaction, the contract price is strong evidence of what would have been the value of the land had it been as represented. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 5:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“A legal malpractice claim accrues ‘when all the facts necessary to the cause of action have occurred and an injured party can obtain relief in court'” (McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301, quoting Ackerman v Price Waterhouse, 84 NY2d 535, 541). [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by Amy Howe
” Coverage of Murr v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 10:11 am by Hakemi
The action was founded on resale price maintenance, refusal to supply and price discrimination. [read post]