Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California"
Results 5181 - 5200
of 11,371
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 am
The McCarran-Ferguson Act postdates the Federal Arbitration Act and some federal appellate courts have held that state law barring or restricting arbitration controls over federal law. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 10:13 am
Davis appealed, and during that appeal, the United States Supreme Court decided the employer-friendly, anti-class action case, Dukes. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 11:04 am
The state supreme court then granted his petition for review. [read post]
28 May 2019, 1:27 pm
The court found that such claims treated the website as the publisher or speaker of the third party sales content and were therefore barred. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 7:32 pm
Check.Current state bar membership? [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 12:01 pm
Take Evidence if you want to be certified as a law student to appear in court. [read post]
8 May 2020, 9:13 am
Wednesday, May 6th – Creatively Diversifying a Print-Centric Library – Holly Riccio, California Judiciary Court Library Holly Riccio and I have a lot in common. [read post]
10 May 2007, 11:21 am
Monday evening concluded with a social at the Southwest School of Art & Craft located on the grounds of a former Ursuline convent downtown on the Riverwalk.Tuesday morning started with breakouts by state (Texas' included a presentation by State Bar president Martha Dickie) and a session on "Our Neighbors To The South" on U.S. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:38 am
”Did plaintiffs state a valid claim? [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 10:46 am
However, both the trial and appellate courts dismissed the claims for being time-barred outside that four-year time window. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 4:33 pm
In a published opinion filed March 24, 2020, the Fourth District Court of Appeal (Division One) reversed a judgment of dismissal with prejudice, entered by the San Diego County Superior Court after sustaining a demurrer without leave on statute of limitations grounds to a group’s action challenging the CEQA review for Caltrans’ Interstate 5 (I-5)/State Route 56 (SR 56) freeway interchange project (the “Project”). [read post]
16 May 2020, 12:19 am
T&B’s Statute of Limitations Defense T&B contended the lawsuit was barred by the four-year limitations period of California Uniform Commercial Code section 2725. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 1:43 pm
The defendants also moved for dismissal of the plaintiffs’ other five claims, all based in state law, as being preëmpted, insufficiently pleaded, time-barred, etc. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 7:50 pm
The strictness of this deadline, and indeed the strictness of the above exception, was illustrated very recently in a formal opinion by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (covering all of California and the far western states) called Willms v. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 4:05 pm
Discrimination The Court of Appeal noted that the California Supreme Court in Cassista v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 8:52 am
Finding Microsoft to be a necessary and indispensable party to the action challenging its project approvals, the trial court held the CEQA action was barred by CEQA’s 30-day statute of limitations (Pub. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 2:33 pm
California's wage orders state as follows: "When an employee works a split shift, one hour's pay at the minimum wage shall be paid in addition to the minimum wage for that workday... [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 3:00 am
While there have been some non-California-headquartered companies that were sued in California state courts over their S-1 filings, most of the suits brought against IPO companies in California state court have a clear California nexus. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 9:47 am
In 1993, an appellate court in California ruled in People vs. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 9:47 am
In 1993, an appellate court in California ruled in People vs. [read post]
