Search for: "United States v. Minor"
Results 5181 - 5200
of 7,102
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2021, 9:05 pm
The administration of elections in the United States—including elections for federal office—is highly decentralized. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 1:20 pm
"And indeed, as pointed out in Bishop Lawrence's response to the petition for mandamus, just one day before filing its motion for enforcement with Judge Dickson, ECUSA had filed a brief in opposition to Bishop Lawrence's petition to the United States Supreme Court for a writ to review the August 2017 decision of the South Carolina Supreme Court (p. 4):On May 7, 2018, Petitioners [in the Circuit Court, i.e., ECUSA and its diocese] argued to the United… [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:34 pm
"And indeed, as pointed out in Bishop Lawrence's response to the petition for mandamus, just one day before filing its motion for enforcement with Judge Dickson, ECUSA had filed a brief in opposition to Bishop Lawrence's petition to the United States Supreme Court for a writ to review the August 2017 decision of the South Carolina Supreme Court (p. 4):On May 7, 2018, Petitioners [in the Circuit Court, i.e., ECUSA and its diocese] argued to the United… [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 10:49 am
United States, 470 U.S. 598 (1985); Fedorov v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 12:35 am
GC & Others v CNIL The first Opinion, and that which is arguably of more general importance, was delivered in GC and Others v CNIL, Case C-136/17 (currently only available in French). [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 4:36 am
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Consumer Credit Protection Act (15 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end thereof the following new title: TITLE VIII – DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES [Fair Debt Collection Practices Act] Sec. 801. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 8:37 am
United States Forest Service, ___ F.3d ___, 2012 U.S. [read post]
Judge Bonapfel – When Are Educational Loans Business Debts For Purposes of Qualifying for Chapter 7?
1 Jun 2022, 6:18 am
United States Trustee (In re Stewart), 215 B.R. 456 (10th Cir. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 7:30 am
The United States government marched approximately 16,000 Cherokees in September or October from their homelands to Indian Territory. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
The last half century has witnessed extraordinary, almost unimaginable, changes in how Americans think about the death penalty.Fifty years ago, in 1972, the United States Supreme Court brought a temporary halt to capital punishment in Furman v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:06 am
Its focus is on preserving the Union (i.e. the United States, seen as a union of states), with slavery treated as a subordinate consideration. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:06 am
Its focus is on preserving the Union (i.e. the United States, seen as a union of states), with slavery treated as a subordinate consideration. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 12:39 am
The United Kingdom – 31965/07 [2012] ECHR 261 (14 February 2012). [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 5:00 pm
Flores, 521 U.S. 507 (1997) and United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 1:10 am
He cited a 1995 Supreme Court opinion - United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 2:57 am
Circuit Judge Rosemary Pooler of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and he then practiced law at Davis Polk & Wardwell and Satterlee Stephens Burke & Burke LLP, both in New York City. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Bureau of Prisons, No. 06-9130 I"n a case involving the scope of 28 U.S.C. section 2680, which carves out certain exceptions to the United States' waiver of sovereign immunity for torts committed by federal employees, the Court rules that section 2680's broad phrase "any other law enforcement officer" covers all law enforcement officers, and not just law enforcement officers enforcing customs or excise laws. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:27 am
The federal government filed the new appeal (United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 9:03 pm
” Walters highlighted that in Gundy v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 6:11 pm
The Court said that for a U.S. court to have jurisdiction to hear these ATS claims, the claims must “touch and concern” the United States. [read post]
