Search for: "Wells v. Justice Court"
Results 5181 - 5200
of 29,128
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2014, 12:20 pm
” Well, not exactly. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
[vi]And then-Justice Rehnquist might have joined the majority in Washington v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:20 am
Well, politicians not named Al Gore, anyway. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 4:24 pm
Supreme Court explained in Birchfield v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 9:05 pm
In Department of Commerce v. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 1:14 pm
” Bing Shun Li v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 8:02 am
Yesterday the Court heard oral argument in Snyder v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 12:00 pm
Those extensions, however, were never challenged in any court and certainly not considered by this Court.CHIEF JUSTICE REHNQUIST: Well, doesn't that itself mean something, Mr. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 2:34 pm
Even in the absence of Justice Antonin Scalia, the justices well may see the case through that lens. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 5:13 pm
On September 19, 1994 the Supreme Court, Appellate Division Second Department was faced with a request from a large, well known insurance company asking the Supreme Court to overturn a ruling entered on October 2, 1992. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am
” Yesterday the justices also heard oral argument in one of the term’s major cases, Janus v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 4:26 am
” At his eponymous blog, Sheldon Nahmod observes that the court’s decision earlier this term in District of Columbia v. [read post]
11 Dec 2024, 1:47 pm
The denial came just under six months after the Supreme Court, in Ohio v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 4:48 am
” The Court’s opinion in Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 2:45 pm
Justice Rushing provides an outstanding answer. [read post]
16 May 2007, 4:21 pm
This case proves contracting parties as well as the Legislature can hand the courts a conundrum in which two contradictory interpretations are equally plausible. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:39 am
Last fall, the Court heard oral arguments in Holt v. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 4:24 pm
It is obvious that the referring court must apply the ruling of the Court of Justice to the case of which it is seised. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 9:41 pm
Well, the Court’s website contains no e-brief invitation, but we think the justices and the Court’s attorneys would appreciate e-briefs every bit as much as the Courts of Appeal. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:31 am
Circuit Court of Appeals gave a pro se (acting as his own attorney) defendant a break in United States v. [read post]
