Search for: "Defendant Doe 2" Results 5201 - 5220 of 40,587
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2013, 10:14 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The appellant-defendants did win a partial reversal, but partial is not enough. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 8:51 am by Marc Soss
  The defendants responded that (1) the debtor’s voting rights were derivative of his role as a manager, (2) he had no other property interest in the LLC, and that (3) their actions did not violate the automatic stay. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 3:27 pm
  Maybe defendant didn't make this argument, but I would think we'd at least have to mention it.(2) Is that really what the California statute means when it says no jurisdiction under California law? [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:04 am by Andrew Frisch
” The Agreement then lists five representative or class action lawsuits in which Securitas is a named defendant, including this lawsuit, “Frankie Williams and Kimberly Ord, filed 12/10/2010, USDC, Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 2:10–CV–07181–HB. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 3:40 am by John L. Welch
The Board dismissed petitioner's claims of genericness and fraud, but it ruled that by showing the mark to be "highly descriptive," the petitioner overcame the presumption arising from registration under Section 2(f) and the burden shifted to respondent to "defend its registration." [read post]
16 May 2016, 9:14 pm by Dennis Crouch
  Much coverage has been given to the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA), which provides a federal private right of action for trade secret protection. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 1:40 pm
(2) Injuries: The personal injury victim in this Cherokee County personal injury case had soft tissue injuries only. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 4:15 pm by Andrew Delaney
Two arguments presented by defendant on appeal: (1) Condition N (prohibiting violent or threatening behavior) is so vague it didn’t provide notice to defendant that the alleged groping behavior would constitute a violation; and (2) the court committed reversible error when it refused to withdraw his counsel. [read post]
27 May 2014, 1:37 pm by Jon Sands
Here, the defendant did not admit that fact at the change-of-plea hearing, so his 42-month sentence exceeds the 2-year statutory maximum, in violation of Apprendi v. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
”[2] In short, in connection with the company’s IPO, the board of the Company effectively agreed to delegate to Ken Moelis virtually all of the rights and powers traditionally reserved for a corporate board, leaving the board, in the court’s words, in an “advisory” status. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 3:59 pm
If the parties have children together, section 40-13-5(A) (2) of the Act allows the court to award either party temporary custody of children and to provide for visitation and child support. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 11:57 am by Brett S. Krantz
Swiss vereins: Tread carefully What does this ruling mean for independent mid-sized firms approached by one of the large international Swiss vereins? [read post]
10 May 2012, 11:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
(And this is true of defendants and plaintiffs.) [read post]