Search for: "Paras v. State" Results 5201 - 5220 of 6,183
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2020, 12:11 am by JR Chaves
Y además se agita el reto de acometer las modificaciones legales que procedan para acompasar el paso a la sentencia. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 10:30 pm by Sophie Dukarm
The answer – according to settled case law – is that the term ‘Member States’ refers to ‘government authorities of the Member States’ (see, for example, Région wallonne v Commission (para. 6.)). [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Hannah Rosborough
Rule 3.5 clearly states that one should never create a neutral citation when an official one is unavailable. [read post]
9 May 2016, 2:16 pm by Giles Peaker
In the Article 8 defence English case law, the Supreme Court seemed pretty clear on the point, at least as a ‘general rule’, at para 61 of Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2011] 2 AC 104. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 11:40 am by Lorelie S. Masters and Paul T. Moura
B [2010] EWHC 1626 (Comm), paras [25-31] (court rejected challenge based upon tribunal’s failure to apply Spanish law); Ruby Roz Agricol LLP v The Republic of Kazakhstan [2017] EWHC 439 (court declined to apply expansive interpretation of Kazakh law).5See English Arbitration Act 1996, Section 69; Enterprise Insurance Company Plc v U-Drive Solutions (Gibraltar) Limited [2016] EWHC 1301 (QB) (court lacked jurisdiction over appeal because Section 69 conditions were not… [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 11:02 am by ADR Times
OnLine SC 1517 (‘Perkins’ ) where the Court has failed to consider para 17 of the TRF case which states that,“It has been observed by the arbitrator, otherwise the legislature could have amended other provisions. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 11:51 am by ADR Times
OnLine SC 1517 (‘Perkins’ ) where the Court has failed to consider para 17 of the TRF case which states that,“It has been observed by the arbitrator, otherwise the legislature could have amended other provisions. [read post]
2 May 2012, 12:27 am by Shaheen Rahman
[Section 149] has a significant role to play” and R(Bapio Action Ltd) v SSHD (2007) EWCA Civ 1139, where it was stated that Due regard must be an essential preliminary to any important policy decision, not a rearguard action following a concluded decision. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 11:40 am by Lorelie S. Masters
B [2010] EWHC 1626 (Comm), paras [25-31] (court rejected challenge based upon tribunal’s failure to apply Spanish law); Ruby Roz Agricol LLP v The Republic of Kazakhstan [2017] EWHC 439 (court declined to apply expansive interpretation of Kazakh law).5See English Arbitration Act 1996, Section 69; Enterprise Insurance Company Plc v U-Drive Solutions (Gibraltar) Limited [2016] EWHC 1301 (QB) (court lacked jurisdiction over appeal because Section 69 conditions were not… [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 5:55 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Radhakrishnan v Maestro Engineers (dispute involving  allegations of fraud cannot be arbitrated) and proceeds on merits. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 9:27 am by Ruth Levush
Such rules require states to refrain from threatening or using force against the territorial integrity of other states (article 2(4) of the UN Charter), except with authorization by the UN Security Council to maintain or restore international peace and security (under Chapter VII of the UN Charter); or for self-defense (under article 51 of the Charter). [read post]