Search for: "State v Smith" Results 5201 - 5220 of 11,009
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2014, 3:53 am by Legal Beagle
Dr Smith said his patient told him "untruths" about his actual condition.The doctor said that he would not have agreed to it had he known the situation.On hearing this, Lord Doherty called the document invalid. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 12:36 am by David Smith
This will mean that the line of cases involving saving provisions such as Lower St Properties v Jones are now irrelevant. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 12:00 am by My name
[xiii] An excellent discussion of the legislative history and Congressional intent of this statute is discussed in United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 3:29 pm by Giles Peaker
Rather unusually, faced with one of the most coruscating High Court judgments I can recall, in AA V LB Southwark [our report here], the senior officers of Southwark Council have chosen to do neither. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 10:03 am
 In Armenia (and on Facebook), anyway.But in the United States, apparently, there are only two. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 2:01 pm by David Smith
Telchadder v Wickland Holdings Ltd [2014] UKSC 57 I will admit to being a bit cool on static caravan parks. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 6:00 am by Mark S. Humphreys
" This was stated as the law in the 1963, Texas Supreme Court case, Smith v. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Tenured teachers and school administrators facing disciplinary action typically have the right to elect the Education Law §3020-a.disciplinary procedure in lieu of a contract disciplinary procedureKilduff v Rochester City Sch. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 1:33 pm by J. Bradley Smith, Esq.
Bradley Smith of Arnold & Smith, PLLC answers the question “Can I be arrested without evidence against me? [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 4:15 am by Ben
 It would have been interesting to have heard the panellists views on the recenty decision by the CJEU in BestWater International GmbH v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 6:50 am
Here's another guest post by Reed Smith's own Kevin Hara, this time about a recent Texas case holding that health care providers involved in clinical trials are still protected by a state medical malpractice statute, and thus were fraudulently joined. [read post]