Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws"
Results 5201 - 5220
of 55,059
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2013, 11:29 am
Aug. 26, 2013) (Digital Media Law Project's page for the case) (Access a copy of the amended settlement agreement here: [pdf].) [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
(The law and ruling are explained in detail here.)In the Indiana case, the Court cited a precedent from 1983, Akron v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 9:30 am
Many people agree with that sentiment. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
In a judgement of 26 July 2022, Nicklin J held that the defamatory meaning was that the Claimant was a hypocrite who had screwed the country and set a poor moral example to young people ([2022] EWHC 2469 (QB)). [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 6:22 am
People v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 11:40 am
Through a diverse nationwide network of progressive lawyers, law students, judges, scholars, and many others, we work to uphold the Constitution in the 21st Century by ensuring that law is a force for protecting our democracy and the public interest and for improving people’s lives. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 6:12 am
People v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 6:14 am
Here is the abstract: This Essay is written in the shadow of a series of noxious attacks on core principles of federal Indian law, most notoriously Haaland v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 7:53 am
She added that tens of thousands of people had been rejected from the registration rolls because of the Arizona law, though there was no evidence that they were not citizens. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 2:48 am
Pa. 2012). [8] Boyle v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 8:14 am
Here are some of the latest materials related to Indian Law. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 12:22 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKBusiness Law
Securities Fraud Claims Against Company's Head Survive Claim as Barred by Five-Year Limit Period
United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 6:57 pm
Balisteri v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 1:15 pm
No matter what everyone else says or does.-- "Clerkships are only for people who make Law Review. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 8:41 am
Indeed Lone Wolf v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 1:47 am
Now, you may question whether that is an invasion of privacy (and many people happily (or maybe unknowingly) permit their telephone number to be transmitted to the person they are calling, but Parliament, the ALRC and the Privacy Commissioner (pdf see p. 402) have taken the view that it is, or should be. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 6:14 am
Virginia law makes it a Class 1 misdemeanor to engage in simulated masturbation in public. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 5:30 am
Hoge v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 1:01 am
The Supreme Court struck down this law as well, but not until 23 years later in Lane v. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 9:15 pm
The resulting lawsuit, Baumann v. [read post]
