Search for: "U.S. v. STATE OF TEXAS"
Results 5201 - 5220
of 8,606
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2014, 11:55 am
Cynthia Alkon (Texas A&M) has published “The U.S. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 10:52 pm
Richard Kopf, Senior U.S. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 8:41 am
U.S. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 6:30 am
On October 15, 2012, U.S. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 6:51 pm
Sys., 573 F.3d 233, 236 (5th Cir.2009) (holding that Texas law requires a doubling of the relative risk of an adverse outcome to prove causation), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 130 S.Ct. 1512 (2010). [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
See United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 6:05 am
Sebelius and Conestoga Wood Specialties v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 5:32 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas recently denied certification of a putative securities law class after finding that plaintiff failed to put forth actual facts showing adequacy and predominance, as required to satisfy the “stringent standards” of Rule 23 pursuant to the Supreme Court’s decisions in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 4:31 pm
Momentum is strong in the wake of the court’s June 2013 decisions in United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 7:03 am
University of Texas at Austin (Office of the Appellate Defender) [KF4755.5 F567 2012 DVD] – Based on a case heard by the U.S. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 9:30 am
Under a 1971 Supreme Court decision, Bivens v. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 11:52 pm
Samsung case in California), slide-to-unlock (at issue in the ongoing Apple v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 12:27 pm
The Texas case is Batiste v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 8:57 am
There, the Court struck down a Texas statute that prohibited the use of state funds to provide elementary and secondary education to children who were not “legally admitted” to the United States because the state distinguished between these children and other children without a “substantial” goal, in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 6:58 pm
But this is Texas and the game is rigged so that the State wins. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 2:58 pm
Or consider my city of Austin, Texas. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:58 am
See U.S. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 7:30 am
State v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 9:52 am
Mar. 19, 2014), the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (Boyle, J.) denied lead plaintiff’s class certification motion in a consolidated action alleging claims under Sections 11, 12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 (“1933 Act”), 15 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 4:24 am
The U.S. [read post]
