Search for: "US v. Smith" Results 5201 - 5220 of 9,459
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2013, 7:27 am by Joy Waltemath
Smith, J.D., MA Two RNs successfully obtained certification of a class of RNs who provided direct patient care in short term acute care facilities while employed by eight Detroit area hospitals from December 12, 2002, through the present by demonstrating predominance and superiority (Cason-Merenda v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 7:27 am by Joy Waltemath
Smith, J.D., MA Two RNs successfully obtained certification of a class of RNs who provided direct patient care in short term acute care facilities while employed by eight Detroit area hospitals from December 12, 2002, through the present by demonstrating predominance and superiority (Cason-Merenda v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 7:28 am
It's good to know that the judges take notice of us, since we spend so much time taking of notice of them. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 6:03 pm by Benjamin Wittes
The Fourth Amendment does not bar the government’s proposed collection of telephony metadata, she writes, because the production “is squarely controlled by” Smith v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:28 pm by Priscilla Smith
Carhart, and its decision earlier this summer in United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 8:10 am by Priscilla Smith
Priscilla (Cilla) Smith is a Senior Fellow at the Information Society Project at the Yale Law School. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 6:38 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
I send thanks to Attorney James Beck of the Philadelphia office of the Reed Smith law firm for bringing this Scott v. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 6:28 am by Patrick S. O'Donnell
“New Orleans Prosecutorial Disclosure in Practice after Connick v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 4:17 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Article 6 of the Civil Rights Law provides a formal procedure for changing a name, which provides the advantages of being speedy, definite and a matter of record as was done in Smith v United States. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 8:23 pm by Donald Thompson
 Not until counsel has been “repeatedly unconscious through not insubstantial portions” of even capital murder trials will prejudice to the defendant will be presumed (see, Muniz v Smith, 647 F3d 619 [6th Cir 2011]; Burdine v Johnson, 262 F3d 336, 340-41 [5th Cir 2001]; Tippins v Walker, 77 F3d 682, 685 [2nd Cir 1996]). [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 6:57 pm by Donald Thompson
 One document that was generated but was out of my plan was “Defendant’s Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Frye-Mack Hearing” in State of Minnesota v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 3:39 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Terrence Kelly, No. 105,934 (Johnson)Sentencing appealCarl Folsom, III[Affirmed; Biles; February 21, 2014]Denial of motion to withdraw pleaImproper counting of priors used to certify for adult prosecutionOctober 23--Wednesday--a.m.State v. [read post]