Search for: "Unit, Inc., Appeal of" Results 5201 - 5220 of 13,891
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2020, 7:14 am by Vandenack Weaver LLC
Upon appeal, the Seventh Circuit held that the District Court should have allowed Facebook to prove that a large number of its employees had entered into arbitration agreements. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 9:36 am by Peter S. Lubin and Vincent L. DiTommaso
Public Storage Inc., Ill. 1st No. 1-09-0094 (Oct. 23. 2009), the appeals court upheld a decision in favor of a woman who lost everything in her storage unit due to a record-keeping error. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 12:10 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCRIMINAL PRACTICENo Reversible Error in Decision Not to Re-Sentence Pursuant to 'Crosby' After Remand United States, appellee v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 12:31 pm by Chris Jaglowitz
Skyline Executive Properties Inc., Doherty J.A. drew the distinction between costs of obtaining the order (which include defending the order obtained on appeal) and costs of enforcement. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 2:34 pm
Abbott Laboratories, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (07-1145). [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 2:16 pm by Glenn R. Reiser
Marco Construction and Management, Inc., et al., Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, Docket No. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 2:11 pm by Ashby Jones
Supreme Court last year called Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 6:35 am by Steven Koprince
The SBA Area Office determined that PRG was owned 48.54% by Frank Frysiek, 48.54% by Intelligent Decisions, Inc. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 8:02 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2008) (modifying an injunction’s terms on appeal); Forest Labs., Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:06 am by Joy Waltemath
” Even if it did, the appeals court explained, its “bare textual analysis of ERISA” alone did not mirror the contextual requirements found in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 7:16 am by Maurice W. McLaughlin
The United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals recently issued an opinion on misclassification of workers in the case of Priya Verma v. 3001 Castor, Inc., which found that adult dancers were employees entitled to the protection of the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act. [read post]