Search for: "COOPER V. COOPER" Results 5221 - 5240 of 11,622
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2015, 2:15 pm by EEM
They discuss policy, cooperation, solutions, and labels.Symposium on Public Attitudes to Refugees, Sydney, 24 July 2015 [access]- Follow link for audio of the various sessions. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 12:21 pm by CJLF Staff
District Judge Cormac Carney concluded in the case of Jones v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 7:30 am by Mathew Purchase, Matrix
He applied his Guidance on the Identification of the Ordinary Residence of People in Need of Community Care Services, England, which purported to apply the House of Lords judgment in R v Barnet LBC, ex parte Shah [1983] 2 AC 309 and Turner J’s judgment in R v Waltham Forest, ex parte Vale The Times, 25 February 1985. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 6:22 am by Joy Waltemath
Circumstances in this case were similar to those found in a Seventh Circuit decision, Pena v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
In the 1996 decision of R v Hinchey, the Supreme Court went through this offence in detail and provided a breakdown of exactly what the Crown needed to prove in order to get a conviction. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 7:04 am by David Lake
The problem of where residual authority resided was not solved until the Supreme Court in Marbury v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 10:19 pm by Patricia Salkin
Da Vinci v Parker, 2015 WL 4737408 (5th Cir CA 8/11/2015)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Equal Protection, Section 1983 Liability Tagged: quaified immunity [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 8:37 am by Joy Waltemath
Disposing next of the Coast Guard’s argument that her failure to cooperate with its investigation barred her claim, the court pointed out that dismissal on that basis is justified only when the lack of cooperation “forces an agency to dismiss or cancel the complaint by failing to provide sufficient information to enable the agency to investigate the claim. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 2:29 am
 However, for whatever reason (but reading between the lines, perhaps their witness was not as cooperative as he might have been) no supplementary evidence was adduced to say that these were the slides he actually presented, and that the notes reflected what he actually said. [read post]