Search for: "Human v. State"
Results 5221 - 5240
of 19,143
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2021, 2:41 am
The Director for Public Prosecutions appealed successfully by way of case stated to the High Court. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 11:26 am
Woolf v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 8:55 am
Department of Health and Human Service, a case that reached the court via the emergency docket (or "shadow docket). [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 6:39 am
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Case No. 6:23-cv-59-JDK (TMA IV). [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 7:08 am
Ct. 2018) and Noffsinger v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 12:38 pm
Related Cases: Google v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 10:21 am
In the California case People v. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 11:30 am
"Sexual freedom is a fundamental human right critical to human dignity and liberty," said Ricci Levy, CEO of the Woodhull Freedom Foundation. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
On 2 September 2021, Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) rejected Dr Stephen Thaler’s appeal against the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v Andrew Hirshfeld and the US Patent and Trademark Office, Mem. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
In the first article in this series I looked at the US approach to the role of the inventor in patent law and practice, and at the recent decision of Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) upholding the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that the ‘AI’ machine DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler… [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 3:43 am
Today the court hears oral argument in Dean v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 4:00 am
Auth., 2009 NY Slip Op 03855, decided on May 12, 2009, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentIn Williams v N.Y.C. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 2:15 pm
On October 7, 2011 the Ontario Court of Appeal released its decision in Smith v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 9:30 pm
Yet, over a century later, Justice Scalia in Arizona v. [read post]
3 Nov 2012, 8:44 am
Airways v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com] No. 07-5439 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States RALPH BAZE, ET AL., Petitioners, v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 10:57 am
The United States (Breach of Settlement Agreement)Mishewal Wappo Tribe of Alexander Valley v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 9:50 am
(Bankruptcy; Tribal Sovereign Immunity)United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 11:26 am
In opposition, Mashel Law argued, inter. alia., that even though the New Jersey Supreme Court had yet to determine whether an out-of-state remote worker who worked for a New Jersey-based company is protected by New Jersey’s employment laws, the New Jersey Appellate Division in Halliday v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 10:30 am
Environmental justice in the United States: The human right to water. [read post]
