Search for: "Lively v. State" Results 5221 - 5240 of 29,017
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Hearings in the Supreme Court are now shown live on the Court’s website. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 8:15 am by Unknown
The OA articles in this listing were previously referenced on this blog as of 1 January 2021.Bronze OA:"An Analysis of the ECtHR Judgment in the Case of N.D. and N.T. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 7:20 am by Nicolas Round (Bristows)
The judge began with a broad definition: Stated generally the law is clear that patents are directed to those likely to have a real and practical interest in the subject matter of the invention[2]. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 5:01 am by Jonathan Shaub
The most famous case on executive privilege is United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 2:00 pm by Vanessa L. Williams
The law was a frontal assault on our constitutional rights — in fact, the government of Guam argued that the right to abortion did not even apply to Guam at all — and was the most restrictive ban enacted in the United States since the Supreme Court had decided Roe v. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
Accused persons remain in a state of uncertainty, often in pre-trial detention. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 2:06 am by Jan von Hein
In turn, the proposed Article 6a of Rome II establishes that: “[…] the law applicable to a non-contractual obligation arising out of the damage sustained shall be the law determined pursuant to Article 4(1), unless the person seeking compensation for damage chooses to base his or her claim on the law of the country in which the event giving rise to the damage occurred or on the law of the country in which the parent company has its domicile or, where it does not have a domicile in a… [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Hearings in the Supreme Court are now shown live on the Court’s website. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 7:47 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The arbitrator stated, Choosing not to vaccinate is not illegal, negligent nor immoral. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 8:18 am by Russell Knight
 2004) “[I]ncarceration, as a foreseeable result of criminal activity, does not ipso facto relieve one of the obligation to pay child support” Meyer v. [read post]