Search for: "Low v. Low" Results 5221 - 5240 of 15,541
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2017, 1:21 am
 It was agreed that the test for originality for database copyright is higher than for literary and artistic works (Football Dataco Limited v Brittens Pools Limited [2010] EWHC 841). [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 11:47 am by Garrett Hinck
Sauter posted the government's reply brief in Carpenter v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 6:41 am by Dan Carvajal
Key Findings The Ohio Commercial Activity Tax, a 0.26 percent tax on business gross receipts above $1 million, is a throwback to an earlier era of taxation, bringing back a tax type that had been in steady retreat for nearly a century. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by Canadian Forum on Civil Justice
Finally, consumers should have access to innovative low-cost legal services that will become available as a result of clarifying the distinction. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 10:15 am
And, as is so often the case with restrictions on abortion, low-income and rural women suffer the most. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 5:00 am by John Zarych
Schedules III-V Schedule III drugs are less-commonly abused drugs with medical use, and have moderate-to-low risks of addictions. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 10:38 am by dawn
October 4, 2016 12:01 AM | Permalink | The Use of Offshore Tax Havens by Fortune 500 CompaniesRead this report in PDF.Download Dataset/Appendix (XLS)Table of ContentsExecutive SummaryIntroductionMost of America’s Largest Corporations Maintain Subsidiaries in Offshore Tax HavensEarnings Booked Offshore for Tax Purposes by U.S. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 1:11 am by Jani Ihalainen
A recent Intellectual Property Enterprise Court decision looked at this very question.The case of Jadebay Ltd & Ors v Clarke-Coles Ltd (t/a Feel Good UK) dealt with the sale of aluminium flagpoles on Amazon. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 9:43 am by Jacob M. Oksman
District Court for the District of Columbia upheld the CA’s denial of treaty benefits (see Starr International Company Inc. v. [read post]