Search for: "State v. L. A. T." Results 5221 - 5240 of 9,947
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2014, 4:16 pm
Bush), Martha Craig Daughtrey (Clinton appointee), and Debra L. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:42 pm by Benjamin Wittes
L. 107-40, 115 Stat. 224 (2001), held that the “United State’s authority to detain an enemy combatant is not dependent on whether an individual would be a threat to the United States or its allies if released but rather upon the continuation of hostilities. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Gov’t agencies and private parties may police these claims under federal and state laws.Artist compensation claims are fact-based, not opinion/puffery. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 2:34 pm
 DePuy argued that plaintiffs’ state law design defect claims were preempted under Pliva v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 7:10 pm by Lauren Bateman
 Vance Spath, begins the morning’s hearing in United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 8:36 pm by Kurt T. Koehler
State Street Ann Arbor, Michigan (MI) 48198 (Washtenaw County); Copyright 2012 by Kurt Koehler [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 5:02 pm by and
The court stated that under the “but for” formulation, “[t]he party invoking the privilege must show ‘the communication would not have been made “but for” the fact that legal advice was sought. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 3:30 pm by David Cosgrove
” In making this determination, the court stated that “[t]he surcharge remedy extended to a breach of trust committed by a fiduciary encompassing any violation of a duty imposed upon that fiduciary. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 3:48 am by Kevin LaCroix
The Delaware Supreme Court stirred up quite a bit of controversy earlier this year in the ATP Tours, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
Over 20 years ago, in 1993, the United States Supreme Court handed down its Daubert decision. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
New York . . . enacted the `Dignity for All Students Act’ in 2010 (see L 2010, ch 482, § 2; Education Law §§ 10 et seq)., declaring that our State must `afford all students in public schools an environment free of discrimination and harassment’ caused by `bullying, taunting or intimidation’ (EducationLaw § 10). [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 2:52 pm
§ 2510(9) as: (a) a judge of a United States district court or a United States court of appeals; and (b) a judge of any court of general criminal jurisdiction of a State who is authorized by a statute of that State to enter orders authorizing interceptions of wire, oral, or electronic communications; That definition tells you what judges can issue wiretap orders — for example, Article III district and circuit judges but not magistrate judges —… [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 8:30 am by Paul Caron
State Dep't of Taxation & Fin., 44 Cumb. [read post]