Search for: "T. P." Results 5221 - 5240 of 45,557
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2012, 5:30 am
They're not paying the bills.And so you get, well, government-run health care:"[P]atients left to lie in their own excrement in Stafford Hospital, with members of the public taking soiled sheets home to wash ... [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 4:17 am
Palacios; Jury Psychology: Finding Their "Not Guilty" Button by Patrick T. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 6:54 pm by Old Fox
., dissenting fromdenial of rehearing en banc).Halbrook, Stephen P., Why Can’t We Be Like France? [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 5:23 pm
(And even more in China.)h/t David Henderson.This feed originates at the personal blog of Scott Lincicome (http://lincicome.blogspot.com). [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 1:50 pm
Robie of the Third District Court of Appeal; vice-chair Justice Douglas P. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 2:40 pm by Joe Patrice
[Slate] * The inimitable Charles P. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 7:57 pm
The district court began its analysis by noting that"[p]atent claims enjoy a presumption of validity. 35 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:17 am by Above the Law
* Snoop and Master P suing Post and Walmart for sabotaging their cereal brand. [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 10:30 pm by Emmanuel Barthe
Aussi de lui : Lobbying : de l'histoire au métier, Géoéconomie, 2014/5, n° 72, p. 165-182 Du lobbying au ( [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Meyer, Kanonistik im Zeitalter von Absolutismus und Aufklärung: Spielräume und Potentiale einer Disziplin im Spannungsfeld von Kirche, Staat und Publizität (Canon Law in the Age of Absolutism and Enlightenment: Scope and Potential of a Discipline between Church, State and Publicity), (Max Planck Institute for European Legal History No. 2012-06, Dec. 2012).Kevin P. [read post]
30 Jun 2018, 4:45 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
P. 26(b)(1) advisory committee’s note to 2015 amendment (emphasis added).Citing the advisory committee note, the court in Polaris Innovations Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 8:15 am by Patrick S. O'Donnell
There’s a provocative yet plausible argument to be made, and Pradeep P. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 10:24 am by La redacción
Es verdad que, como se ha externado públicamente, la reforma en sí misma atenta contra el principio de progresividad de los derechos humanos reconocido en el artículo 1. [read post]