Search for: "United States v. Minor"
Results 5221 - 5240
of 6,200
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2008, 8:10 pm
Martin argues that the district court erred in calculating his advisory United States Sentencing Guidelines ("USSG") range by (1) applying the two-level enhancement under USSG § 2G2.1(b)(5) because the child victims were in his care, custody, or super [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am
With free legal aid from National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Geary filed a federal complaint arguing the union infringed on her constitutionally protected rights under the foundation-won CWA v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Horn, No. 03-9010, 03-9011 In a capital-murder case, petition for a writ of habeas corpus is granted where: 1) the time period for filing the petition was tolled during state-court proceedings, and the federal petition was therefore timely; 2) the state fugitive-forfeiture rule did not apply to procedurally default the petition; 3) the jury instructions and verdict sheet that were used during the penalty phase of petitioner's trial denied him due process of law pursuant to… [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 10:31 am
Latimer v. [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 6:27 am
United States, that the government "has charged itself with moral obligations of the highest responsibility and trust" in "dealing with the Indians [and] should therefore be judged by the most exacting fiduciary standards." [read post]
4 Apr 2020, 7:51 am
Decisions this Week United StatesSwart v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 8:20 am
Urbina previously had ordered that the Uighurs must be released, and that the only place for them to be sent was to live, at least temporarily, in the United States. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 10:33 pm
AND MARPER v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Haviland, No. 07-3380 Grant of a conditional writ of habeas corpus is affirmed where: 1) petitioner sought to represent himself at trial, and the trial court's failure to rule on his requests to proceed pro se deprived him of his Sixth Amendment right to self-representation; and 2) state courts' objectiv [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 8:37 pm
While those cases still permeate state and federal courts, large event-driven litigation has become much more common than it was. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 2:55 am
Major Connecticut-based corporations are decamping to other states, reducing their in-state footprint, or being acquired by out-of-state firms, including, most recently, the merger of the Massachusetts-based Raytheon Company with the Connecticut-based United Technologies, with the new company to be headquartered in the Boston area.[16] Here too, relocations are not primarily to the Sun Belt, but toward places like New York City, Boston, and Chicago. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 6:41 am
I also want to wish you, and all thefriends of the people ofthe United States of America, a happy Fourth of July. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 12:01 pm
” Or, after Lee v. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 1:08 pm
See Speier v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 6:39 am
But as illogical and impractical as that ruling seems, the case being argued, United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 9:03 pm
In Department of Commerce v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 8:12 am
State v. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 7:16 pm
One is in the area of the rights of minority shareholders. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 10:50 am
As stated above, this mindset is both helpful and harmful. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 9:56 pm
Magistrates in the Tang Dynasty in early China were also eager to avoid the formal legal system and so encouraged parties to resolve disputes amicably between themselves.[9] In contrast, the United States’ patent law can be seen in the case of Twentieth Century Music Corp. v. [read post]
