Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 5241 - 5260
of 13,865
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2014, 5:02 am
Solicitor General’s office said nothing about the 1944 ruling in Korematsu v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 7:46 am
" The Court of Appeals allows his case to proceed.The case is McGarry v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am
The European Court of Human Rights in the decision Bayev and others v. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 7:50 am
Members of the public are deemed to have knowledge of an agency’s administrative action that has been posted on the Internet Eskridge v Nassau County BOCES, Decisions of the Commissioner Education, Decision No. 16,932Meredith Eskridge appealed the decision of the Board of Cooperative Educational Services of Nassau County [BOCES] denial of her request to be placed on the preferred eligibility list for a position as a teacher of deaf and hard of hearing. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:31 pm
Supreme Court granted certiorari in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
Dalton v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 1:44 pm
We have since "t[aken] up the Supreme Court's suggestion" and "held that, even in administrative proceedings in which ... the exclusionary rule [does [*9] not ordinarily apply], administrative tribunals are still required to exclude evidence that was 'obtained by deliberate violations of the Fourth Amendment or by conduct a reasonable officer should know is in violation of the Constitution.'" Id. at 493 (quoting Adamson… [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 10:36 pm
Two earlier posts had discussed the issue and the oral arguments before the United States Supreme Court in Hertz Corp. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 10:09 am
See United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:42 am
Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit 2010)).Republic of Kazakhstan v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
Malinda Ruch v. [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 4:13 pm
See, e.g., State of Fla., Office of Atty. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 10:42 pm
In Matter of Stortecky v Mazzone and Matter of Vitole, Matter of Phelan, it was held that the court bears the ultimate responsibility for approving legal fees that are charged to an estate and has the discretion to determine what constitutes reasonable compensation for legal services rendered in the course of the administration of an estate. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 10:46 pm
A Staten Island Probate Lawyer said in Matter of Stortecky v Mazzone and Matter of Vitole, Matter of Phelan, it was held that the court bears the ultimate responsibility for approving legal fees that are charged to an estate and has the discretion to determine what constitutes reasonable compensation for legal services rendered in the course of the administration of an estate. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 11:14 am
. - The opinion in Blackhorse v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 8:49 am
The Second Circuit has said that municipal liability cannot attach when the arresting officer has qualified immunity, but that case said that in the course of a brief discussion in Kass v. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 6:14 am
Defending Alice The Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Alice v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 6:30 am
The purpose of the Federal Judicial Center is to further the development and adoption of improved judicial administration in the courts of the United States, primarily through rigorous and objective research and education. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 9:45 am
Who won Trump v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 2:48 am
In Lincoln v. [read post]
