Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 5241 - 5260
of 9,189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2010, 3:46 am
Nueva Generacion Music Group, Inc (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) District Court C D California: BitTorrent site liable for Grokster style inducement of copyright infringement: Columbia Pictures v Fung (Internet law - Internet Cases) District Court N D California rejects RealNetworks’ claim that movie studios were colluding against it (Ars Technica) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps EMI - EMI attacks NirGaga mashup (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (Copyfight) OK Go… [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 7:40 am
One -- at the crack of dawn on Monday morning -- is a chance to share a breakfast with the early-rising Head of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, David Kappos (details here). [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:48 am
In affirming the district court's decision, the United States Supreme Court relied on the ‘collective entity‘ doctrine. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 9:41 pm
Summery but not so summary: EWCA (Civ) decision in trade mark infringement case Oracle America Inc (formerly Sun Microsystems Inc) v M-Tech Data Ltd and Lichtenstein (IPKat) Nokia fakes case: silence over official submission (IPKat) UK’s Digital Economy Act hurts digital technology development (ipeg) United States US Patents Did the lack of software savvy patent attorneys cause a decline in patent quality? [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 4:21 am
In Rucho v. [read post]
12 Mar 2025, 9:01 pm
The military defines gender dysphoria as “a marked incongruence between one’s experienced or expressed gender and assigned gender of at least 6 months’ duration, as manifested by conditions associated with clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 7:13 am
Ex Parte Challenges to Registrations With some limited exceptions, a trademark owner must use a mark in interstate commerce in the United States before the mark can qualify for registration. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 4:59 pm
The case examines a post made by Musk on social media stating he was considering privatising Tesla and the following investigation by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: US CAFC: Continuation limits invalid; limits on claims and RCEs are ok: Tafas v Doll (Patently-O) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Promote the Progress) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 7:07 am
In Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 7:30 am
Cases from your El-Masri v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:11 am
Here, the TTAB held that "[t]he fact that applicant is a foreign entity that is representing itself without previous experience in United States trademark procedure cannot avoid a finding of fraud. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:13 am
Bacardi had sued Pernod stating that they were the rightful proprietor of the mark HAVANA CLUB. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
United States v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm
Stevens and United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 4:02 am
“Generislide”: mark becomes generic. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 8:00 pm
United States, 54 App. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 2:00 am
’ See [Mark L. [read post]
