Search for: "Mays v. Paul" Results 5241 - 5260 of 7,412
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2010, 8:00 am by Kent Scheidegger
US Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens (Ret.) is the principal architect of today's constitutional jurisprudence of capital sentencing. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
ECHR case law has established that even where criminal prosecution is justified in principle, a disproportionate sentence may result in a breach of Article 10 (Sener v Turkey (2003) 37 EHRR 34), and that the justification for any criminal sanction must be “convincingly established” (Sunday Times v UK (No. 2) 14 EHRR 229). [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 12:21 am by 1 Crown Office Row
   In this context, the Court considered Lord Nicholls’ fourth principle in Tse Wai Chun Paul v Albert Cheng ([2001] EMLR 777): the comment must explicitly or implicitly indicate, at least in general terms, what are the facts on which the comment is being made. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 7:40 am by Sonya Hubbard
” But at this point, any discrepancies may not matter. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 6:01 am by charonqc
REASONS FOR THE JUDGMENT The elements of the defence of fair comment had been set out by Lord Nicholls in the Hong Kong case of Tse Wai Chun Paul v Albert Cheng [2001] EMLR 777. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 9:59 pm by Matthew Flinn
ECHR case law has established that even where criminal prosecution is justified in principle, a disproportionate sentence may result in a breach of Article 10 (Sener v Turkey (2003) 37 EHRR 34), and that the justification for any criminal sanction must be “convincingly established” (Sunday Times v UK (No. 2) 14 EHRR 229). [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
   In this context, the Court considered Lord Nicholls’ fourth principle in Tse Wai Chun Paul v Albert Cheng ([2001] EMLR 777): “the comment must explicitly or implicitly indicate, at least in general terms, what are the facts on which the comment is being made. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 9:09 am by Cindy Dabney
On Sunday Stevens appeared on 60 Minutes, talking not only about the death penalty, but also the Bush v. [read post]