Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 5241 - 5260
of 15,316
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2018, 8:48 am
Put another way, if A sends a text message to B, and the police discover that text message during a search of B’s phone, does A have standing to challenge the constitutionality of the search? [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
Article 40(c) states that: (c) Notification of a Government decision to begin a war under the provision of subsection (a) will be submitted to the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Security Committee as soon as possible; the Prime Minister also will give notice to the Knesset plenum as soon as possible; notification regarding military actions as stated in subsection (b) will be given to the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Security Committee as soon as possible. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 6:18 pm
All of this cooperation is to be undertaken at the state to state level--no people to people focus here (Ibid., Art. 4). [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
C. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
Dieser v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 6:45 am
§ 2253(c)(2); and whether Richardson v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 2:00 am
That's even more the case after United States v. [read post]
1 Jan 2018, 8:01 pm
I previously wrote about Judge Gilstrap’s decision in BigCommerce and the somewhat complex issue of venue in multi-district states. [read post]
1 Jan 2018, 6:50 am
In Texas v. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 12:22 pm
But then there are two previous judgments on this issue, which the Upper Tribunal then turns to: Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Nelson and Fife Council (2014) UKUT 525 (AAC) (our report here) and Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Glasgow City Council and IB (2017) CSIH 35 (our report here). [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 11:24 am
Both decisions are in the case United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
The topic had already been subject to nearly 20 references to the CJEU for preliminary rulings, and yes, there would be more from the court in 2017 as the decisions in Filmspeler, C-527/15, and Ziggo, C-601/15 (The Pirate Bay) loomed! [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 12:47 pm
While Section 503(b)(1)(B) of the Communications Act authorizes the FCC to penalize any person who violates the Act or the FCC’s Rules, neither the FCC’s Rules nor its forfeiture guidelines establish a base fine amount for specific EEO violations. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 10:25 am
By Jessica C. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 2:33 pm
“Almost all scientists have stated (or have been tempted to state) something like ‘the mean of Group A was greater than that of Group B, but the difference was not statistically significant’. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
Kihuen, Dan Kildee, Carolyn B. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
Kihuen, Dan Kildee, Carolyn B. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 10:14 am
V(1)(c). [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 4:00 am
The key case on originality in Canada is CCH Canadian Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 11:54 am
c. [read post]
