Search for: "State v. Laws" Results 5241 - 5260 of 156,420
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2010, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
Lord Phillips also re-named the defence as “honest comment” (as opposed to Court of Appeal in BCA v Singh [2010] EWCA Civ 350, which favoured “honest opinion” [35]) and called on the Law Commission to consider and review the present state of the defence. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 7:35 am by Patrick Hindert
On October 14, 2009, the United States Second Circuit Court of Appeals denied Hartford's petition which challenged an order by United States District Court Judge Janet C. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
” The post Divided Court Rejects Lethal Injection Challenge in Bucklew v Precythe appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The elected Arizona legislature (and Chief Justice John Roberts’s dissent), like the Rehnquist concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
New York State's Human Rights Law requires the compliant to be filed with the State Division of Human Rights within one year of the most recent act of the unlawful discrimination alleged2017 NY Slip Op 06968, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentThe Petitioner in this action, a long-term, at-will employee of the Town, was advised that his employment would be terminated as part of the Town's transitioning to the incoming administration of a newly elected Town… [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 6:07 am by Christopher Mathews
The prosecution presented excerpts from LTC Lakin’s Care inquiry in which he admitted under oath that his former attorney, Paul Jensen, expressly told the accused that the orders he’d received were lawful, and that as an attorney, Mr. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 5:58 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky and Mark J. Levin
”  Because the FAA preempts inconsistent state laws, the Executive Order may be preempted by federal law. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
United States Supreme Court distinguishes a law from a regulation for the purposes the federal whistle blower statute Department of Homeland Security v MacLean, USSC #13-984 A federal air marshal publicly disclosed that the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) had decided to cut costs by removing air marshals from certain flights. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 5:00 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
That analysis leads to the inescapable conclusion that although the Court has abandoned Worcester’s categorical prohibition on state jurisdiction in Indian country, “the broad principles of that decision came to be accepted as law. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:22 pm by NARF
Colville Confederated Tribes (Time Served; Due Process and Equal Protection Rights) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2023.html Ronan F. v. [read post]