Search for: "State v. Levell "
Results 5241 - 5260
of 29,472
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2015, 8:55 am
Michigan v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 3:36 am
At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps looks at the story behind a state constitutional provision relied on by Montana in Espinoza v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 2:20 am
The respondents’ duty was not to establish the precise scope of art 2 duties to determine an appropriate level for the whimbrel but to determine whether to grant consent by taking into account all of the material considerations, of which the Directive formed part. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 2:41 pm
That was not the case in U.S. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 7:00 am
But what level of agency costs did Congress want to achieve? [read post]
5 May 2021, 6:24 am
First, Defendant cited Miller v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 12:24 pm
See Nigra v. [read post]
14 May 2021, 8:53 am
In the CTA v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 8:04 am
Gil relied on Rendon v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 8:04 am
Gil relied on Rendon v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 8:04 am
Gil relied on Rendon v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 11:19 am
San Jose's Inclusionary Housing Ordinance To implement the state's inclusionary housing policy, the City of San Jose (the "City") passed in 2010 an Inclusionary Housing Ordinance ("IHO"). [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 9:20 am
In 1998, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. [read post]
2 May 2015, 11:13 pm
The Appellate Division reversed the conviction, relying on a 2000 decision, State v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 8:51 am
As far as the Court was concerned, the real cause of the flood was the exceptional level of rainfall, for which the State could not be held to blame.The Applicants therefore took their case to the ECHR, relying on breaches of Article 1, Article 2 (right to life), Article 8 and Article 13 (right to an effective remedy). [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 3:55 am
Palestine Liberation Organization, a lawsuit filed by American families and victims of terrorist attacks in Israel, arguing that “the Department of Justice’s refusal to defend an act of Congress specifically designed to protect United States citizens should be reconsidered at the highest levels of the Trump administration. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 2:03 pm
Since all of the requested information was not provided, the 30-day period in which Progressive was obligated to pay or deny the Hospital's claim did not begin to run as was held in Westchester Medical Center v State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co., Hospital for Joint Diseases v New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance Co, New York & Presbyterian Hosp v Countrywide Insurance Co. and Montefiore Medical Center v Government Employees Insurance Co. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 7:47 am
Microsoft v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 4:14 pm
Human Rights Commission v. [read post]
