Search for: "State v. Main" Results 5241 - 5260 of 11,238
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2008, 10:33 am
United States, it seems the government had decided that it agreed with plaintiff Michael Greenlaw on the main sentencing-related issue in the case. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 3:49 pm by LTA-Editor
” The Article advocates consideration of the United Kingdom’s jurisprudence as persuasive authority for implementation of a new framework for analysis of subject matter eligibility of computer-implemented inventions in light of the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Alice Corp. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 2:01 pm by Trademark Attorney
It wasn’t until the 90’s, in the seminal Supreme Court case of State Street Bank v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 3:49 pm by LTA-Editor
” The Article advocates consideration of the United Kingdom’s jurisprudence as persuasive authority for implementation of a new framework for analysis of subject matter eligibility of computer-implemented inventions in light of the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Alice Corp. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 12:35 pm
As we have witnessedin the last few months with Syria, Germany, and other EU states, the unlikely weaponmay have been enacted again" (Greenhill, 2010, p. 26)4.In traditional military coercion, the aim is to achieve political goals "on the cheap".Weak actors could also use mass migration to achieve political goals that would be utterlyunattainable through traditional military means or, in a more limited number of cases, forpowerful actors to achieve aims wherein the use of… [read post]
10 May 2024, 2:30 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
Advanced Cell Diagnostics v Molecular Instruments [2024] EWHC 898 (Pat) On 23 April 2024, Mr Justice Meade handed down his judgment in the dispute between Advanced Cell Diagnostics (ACD) and Molecular Instruments (MI). [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
City of Riviera of Riviera Beach, 133 S.Ct. 735 (2013): On January 15, 2013, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its opinion in Lozman v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
Resolving the conflict Mostyn J had taken the view in EBK v DLO (above) at [101] that “if a defendant in proceedings governed by FPR Part 37 or COPR Part 21 is found to have committed a contempt then that defendant must be named in open court and in general terms the court must state what is the nature of the contempt of court and what punishment, if any, has been imposed. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 10:18 am
United States (06-1509), Crawford v. [read post]