Search for: "United States v. Marks"
Results 5241 - 5260
of 9,515
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2019, 9:03 am
United States and Skilling v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 10:32 am
United States. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 12:56 pm
The United States formally confirmed that it made a “mistake” in accidently striking Syrian regime forces instead of Islamic State fighters on September 17th, the BBC tells us. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 1:49 pm
Carter v. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 9:14 am
The United States scarcely resembles the fledgling republic that emerged at the end of the 18th century. [read post]
10 May 2010, 3:55 am
– NGHC hears passing off case concerning ‘Simply Slim’ slimming tablets; WCHC hears trade mark infringement case concerning use of ‘marula’ on liqueur label (Afro-IP) Switzerland Prayers to Madonna didn’t help - trade mark cannot be registered for various goods(Class 46) United Kingdom But who will regulate the regulators? [read post]
3 May 2020, 4:16 pm
United States The Verge had a piece on a group of Senate Republicans planning to introduce a privacy bill that would regulate the data collected by coronavirus contact tracing apps. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
”[1] The constitutional sphere in the United States, the UK, Canada, and Germany are honorable members of that commonly explored (to put it mildly) “platinum club. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 2:38 pm
The essay first situates the CSOE within the political ideology of its home state. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 2:06 pm
(Starting with Bush v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:12 am
The ACLU praised last week’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 4:02 am
The United States of America v Nolan, heard 15 July 2015. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 8:24 am
Nystrom v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am
(Docket Report) District Court E D Washington: False marking claim defeated at summary judgment – Employee mistakes do not constitute false marking: Bow Jax Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 8:25 am
” Couture v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:14 am
” United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 6:30 pm
The application (Davis v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:35 am
And unkind reader of the evolving dispute over the Louboutin red sole trade mark in the United States might be forgiven for saying that murky rules of unclear application are found there too. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 1:56 am
EPE stood its ground, also stating that it had built up significant goodwill in its trade marks and logos to the extent that a substantial body of the public, upon seeing those marks and logos, would believe those goods or services to be those of EPE and its lawful licensees. [read post]
