Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 5261 - 5280
of 7,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2020, 3:30 am
A few months ago, the Supreme Court decided Bostock v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 8:01 am
The French Republic v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 6:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
English: Alexandria, Virginia U.S. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 1:15 am
and industrial applicability in Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences Inc, noted by the IPKat here, is (according to a normally reliable source whom the Kat thanks) to be heard by the Supreme Court on Thursday 7 October. [read post]
21 May 2014, 1:40 pm
Accordingly, in McQuillan v. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 2:27 pm
Longhi v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 12:15 am
Thus, I was particularly amused to learn that my love of Latin is shared by The Onion which explained its Latin motto, tu stultus es, in an amicus brief filed yesterday with no less than the United States Supreme Court in Novak v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 10:31 am
Since then, while in some English and Dutch theatres plausibility has gained some popularity, it has been less acclaimed elsewhere. [read post]
14 May 2010, 4:24 am
(see the IPKat's earlier posts here and here) is now available here in English too. [read post]
29 May 2015, 11:57 am
Defendant, who recently resigned his position, had been working at this particular school for six years as an English teacher. [read post]
9 May 2012, 6:59 am
Supreme Court amicus brief on behalf of UNHCR in Negusie v Mukasey, an asylum case on which IntLawGrrl Jaya Ramji-Nogales has posted. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 8:31 am
In Elmagin Capital, LLC v. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:06 am
Agri Processor v. [read post]
16 Sep 2017, 6:55 am
The court may declare ineligible to act as fiduciary a person unable to read and write the English language. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 5:36 am
The issue of publicity more generally, and the issue of parties to an Inquiry being able to cross-examine witnesses, was addressed to some extent by the Court of Appeal in R (D) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] EWCA Civ 143, albeit in the context of an investigation into a death in custody under Article 2 of the ECHR. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 10:55 am
This doctrine was established in the 1920 United States Supreme Court case Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 9:30 pm
– Writing for the Court in FCC v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
In his famous speech to the English House of Commons in 1841, Thomas Babington Macaulay said: The advantages arising from a system of copyright are obvious. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 4:09 pm
Four people described as “sports stars” have become the latest celebrities to be named in American publications despite having injunctions in English courts. [read post]
