Search for: "In Re: Does v."
Results 5261 - 5280
of 30,602
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2020, 6:34 am
“the Former Spouses’ Protection Act does not grant state courts the power to treat as property divisible upon divorce military retirement pay that has been waived to receive veterans’ disability benefits” Mansell v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 1:08 pm
Third Circuit: We already decided that it does not when we denied the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, so we're bound by the law of the case and cannot reconsider. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 10:48 am
The bill further codifies Executive Order N-51-20 by mandating supplemental paid sick leave for food sector workers if they’re unable to work due to any of the specified reasons relating to COVID-19. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 10:21 am
Thus, “Where an advertisement does not incorporate the plaintiff’s trademark, there is no likelihood of confusion as a matter of law” (cites to 1-800 Contacts v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 7:23 am
As noted above, SHLB on August 28 asked the FCC to allow RHC applicants to re-open their FY 2020 funding applications and seek additional bandwidth to help deal with COVID-related demand. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 9:05 pm
Senator Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) reportedly applauded the settlement and said that if the federal government does not meet its commitment by 2037, “I don’t know if I’ll be around. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:50 pm
If you tell a party to breach his contract with X, with knowledge of that contract, and he does so, then you're liable. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 2:05 pm
Washington and Colorado v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
The project has been primarily focused on undertaking empirical research to address two main research questions: what does it cost to deliver an effective civil justice system, and what does it cost – economically and socially – if we fail to do so. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 3:51 am
irketi v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 11:01 am
” Hewitt v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 9:33 am
In re VerHoef, 888 F.3d 1362, 1365 (Fed. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
Supreme Court held in Rucho v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 5:48 am
The case is called Chase v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 7:32 pm
And because he does, mandamus is not appropriate in this case at this time. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 3:00 pm
In most cases, even if the original product was placed on the market on which it is being re-sold in its repurposed form, trade mark exhaustion should not be an obstacle for the brand owner. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 2:36 pm
"] From Friday's decision in Doe v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 2:05 pm
And you can think about that as you frame your arguments, as you draft your briefs, when you’re reading the precedents and you’re looking back at old arguments about what the justices are concerned about and who’s concerned about what and when you’re trying to count to five, which is what you’re trying to do in the Supreme Court. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:21 pm
" Doe v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:08 pm
Second, Chandris, Inc. v. [read post]
