Search for: "JONES v. THE STATE" Results 5261 - 5280 of 6,262
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2011, 7:55 am by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
   Immunity of Expert Witnesses For civil practitioners, one of the most interesting and potentially far reaching decisions of the term was Jones v Kaney [2011] UKSC 13. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
 Canada In the case of R v Jones 2017 SCC 60, the Supreme Court held that text messages may attract a reasonable expectation of privacy even after they have been sent and received. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 6:48 am by Lauren Vodopia
The New Jersey Supreme Court has recognized the right to be left alone in State v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 3:16 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed in the Denver Post, Joseph Smith Jr. weighs in on Endrew F. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 1:01 pm by Suzanne Ito
Pineda-Moreno, a Ninth Circuit case that could play a significant role in determining how broadly the Supreme Court's recent GPS tracking decision, United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 12:48 pm
  Absent a specific assurance of adequacy, insurers do not have a general duty to investigate and inform the insured of adequacy of coverage, Jones v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 7:28 pm by Michael Smith
United States, 440 U.S. 48, 55, 99 S.Ct. 914, 918, 59 L.Ed.2d 136 (1979); Matter of Jones, 768 F.2d 923, 927 (7th Cir.1985). [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 9:44 am by Steve Vladeck
Instead, it points to the Supreme Court’s 1974 decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 2:37 pm by Miriam Baer
 And yet, following the DC Circuit's decision in United States v Maynard (which eventually became United States v Jones when it was decided by the Supreme Court), individual jurists and scholars have increasingly embraced a mosaic theory of the Fourth Amendment, under which a discrete action (watching someone in public, seeking their phone records via a grand jury subpoena) becomes unconstitutional when government officials engage in that action too… [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Trademark Review and Appraisal Board of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce of the People’s Republic of China (China Blawg) Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People's Court: TRAB ordered to re-decide TUAN TOURAN review application: Volkswagen Inc v Trademark Review And Appraisal Board Of The State Administration For Industry And Commerce Of The People’s Republic Of China (China Blawg) Just Do It? [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Trademark Review and Appraisal Board of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce of the People’s Republic of China (China Blawg) Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People's Court: TRAB ordered to re-decide TUAN TOURAN review application: Volkswagen Inc v Trademark Review And Appraisal Board Of The State Administration For Industry And Commerce Of The People’s Republic Of China (China Blawg) Just Do It? [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Danny Weitzner - Open Internet Policy), United States: How many lines is de minimis? [read post]