Search for: "Laws v. Laws" Results 5261 - 5280 of 269,288
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2024, 10:52 am by Giles Peaker
Further, applying RR v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2019] UKSC 52 it was possible to disapply the discriminatory parts of the regulations to give JA a remedy without her needing to make a separate human rights claim. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 8:38 am by Larry
DiCarlo – US Court of International Trade Lecture at the University of Illinois – Chicago Law School (FKA the John Marshall Law School). [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 8:00 am
After she was hired, and started sporting naturally curly hair, the company’s owner is said to have complained about that latter look and directed that she don a wig.Because such conduct purportedly violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission (EEOC) filed suit, (EEOC v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 7:06 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
There is a major exception to the FAA, and that arose on April 12, when the Supreme Court examined the transportation exception.The case is Bissonnette v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:41 am by Dan Bressler
” “In support of this argument, IMTC cited two foreign (and therefore non-binding) cases in which no conflict of interest was found to exist: Jones v AMP Perpetual Trustee Company NZ Ltd (1994) (New Zealand) and HSBC (HK) Ltd v Secretary of State for Justice (2001) (Hong Kong). [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:40 am by Dylan Gibbs
The Association can’t force the government to offer legislative protection without showing that other remedies are inadequate and that the government is responsible for the casino managers’ lack of bargaining power.An important standard of review clarification: The Court has given mixed signals in the past about how to judicially review findings of mixed fact and law connected to constitutional questions. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 5:53 am by Eleonora Rosati
Consequently, the legislator should have abandoned the novelty test when reviewing, reshaping, and recasting EU design law. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 3:30 am by Emma Cave
Emma Cave In Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority (1986) the UK House of Lords held that minors under the age of 16 could access contraceptive advice and treatment in their own right provided they satisfied a test which became known as “Gillick competence. [read post]