Search for: "MAY v. MAY"
Results 5261 - 5280
of 183,103
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2015, 1:51 pm
While those that do settle may not longer be compelled to pay additional damages, they may still be found liable in court. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 10:25 am
See Sasqua v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
The Court has been announcing its cert. grants on Fridays lately, so if the cases are taken up, we may hear about it today. [read post]
31 May 2019, 8:25 am
In Rodriguez v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 8:25 am
In Rodriguez v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
A municipality may rescind its decision to defend and indemnify an employee being sued for acts or omission that occurred performing official duties if the individual fails to cooperateLancaster v Incorporated Village of Freeport, 2013 NY Slip Op 07652, Court of AppealsThe Court of Appeals ruled that a municipality, here the Village of Freeport, may withdraw from its defense and indemnification obligations otherwise required under provisions of the Freeport Village Code… [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
"However “pension boosting” may be made available to encourage individuals “to retire early” by promising an enhanced pension or may be offered in other contexts, including in exchange for a promise not to retire, as demonstrated by the decision in Thompson v New York State Teachers' Retirement Sys., 78 AD3d 1456.Finding that the record contains substantial evidence supporting the Comptroller's determination that the Authority… [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
"However “pension boosting” may be made available to encourage individuals “to retire early” by promising an enhanced pension or may be offered in other contexts, including in exchange for a promise not to retire, as demonstrated by the decision in Thompson v New York State Teachers' Retirement Sys., 78 AD3d 1456.Finding that the record contains substantial evidence supporting the Comptroller's determination that the Authority… [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 7:33 am
That may have been a fortuitous act and provided a clean opinion in Chiafalo v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:05 pm
Jackson, Pace Law School commencement speaker, May 16, 2010. 28 Pace Envtl. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 10:06 pm
What might be considered exceptional in a low value matter may not be exceptional in a substantial piece of litigation. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 11:50 am
I have been hearing for awhile that there is a chance that the South Carolina State Legislature may take action in response to the South Carolina Supreme Court's decision in Branham v. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 4:01 pm
Michael Atkins (a/k/a the Seattle Trademark Lawyer) has graciously offered to host "Meet the Bloggers V" at this year's INTA Annual Meeting in Seattle.Date: Monday, May 18 Time: 6-9 p.m. [read post]
21 May 2020, 5:06 pm
Kirby v. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 6:48 am
Loudoun County Supervisors Deleting Comments to County Facebook Page May Violate First Amendment–Davison v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 4:47 am
Doctrine of estoppel against governmental entities may be invoked where its "misleading nonfeasance would otherwise result in a manifest injustice"Agress v Clarkstown Cent. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 11:39 am
It begins: After oral arguments at the Supreme Court in Trump v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 6:12 am
Weeks v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 2:51 pm
On May 12, 2010, the California Supreme Court denied the petition for review and request for depublication in Jaimez v. [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 10:55 pm
Cryptography Research, Inc. v. [read post]
