Search for: "Martin v. Martin" Results 5261 - 5280 of 6,190
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2022, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
Research and Resources Senftleben, Martin, A Tax on Machines for the Purpose of Giving a Bounty to the Dethroned Human Author – Towards an AI Levy for the Substitution of Human Literary and Artistic Works (2022), University of Amsterdam Pin, Andrea, ‘A Novel and Controversial Technology. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:00 pm by Old Fox
From about 1520 he belonged to a group of scholars who met regularly to discuss the theological problems raised by Martin Luther’s revolt; known to be inclined to the new way of thinking, they were dubbed “Little Germany. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am by Joel R. Brandes
To punish such a parent by requiring higher child support ... is neither good law nor good policy” (Abouhalkah v. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 5:37 pm
V) MALVEAUX: Congressman Clyburn earlier said today, "I think he can afford to tone it down. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am by INFORRM
The story cites a range of allegations, some of which would involve criminality, made against a person identifying as “Martin Branning”. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am by INFORRM
Media Standards Trust director and campaign co-founder Martin Moore argued that the Leveson Inquiry “urgently needs to break open the Motorman files – not least because they might reveal how phone hacking really worked” in a post here. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 1:49 pm by John Elwood
” In just one-and-a-half pages (more than one-tenth of which consisted of a single quote from the Court’s 1816 decision in Martin v. [read post]