Search for: "Matter of Robert T" Results 5261 - 5280 of 10,569
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2015, 8:52 am by WIMS
Senator Pat Roberts (R-KS) Chairman of the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry, today held a hearing on the impacts of the U.S. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:30 am by Betty Lupinacci
(Robots, apparently, allow ice cream to be a main dinner course and don’t enforce rules!) [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 3:34 am by SHG
No, a statement by a criminal defendant is never hearsay, it’s a party statement, and in this instance a statement against penal interest, but it doesn’t matter. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:10 am
  Among other matters, it includes some relevant innovations as regards pharma patent’s compulsory licences, Katfriend Mark Summerfield explains.* "Are you sitting comfortably ...? [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:06 am by INFORRM
  A previous complaint was dismissed by the police on the basis that the matter was civil and regulatory. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 8:20 am by Jeff Gamso
Perhaps.Of course, it matters just what we're trying to accomplish.Thane Rosenbaum wants revenge. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
As a formal matter, the proposed reading would not amount to commandeering because the states would be given a choice. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 4:55 am by SHG
In the case of Robert Murray, dismissal of charges against the defendant resolves one side of the equation. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 10:11 am by Calvin Massey
  That clear focus may have been enough to motivate Roberts to conclude that because Yates was no Enron operative he couldn’t have been intended to be swept up in the SOX fishnet. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:15 am by INFORRM
For reasons we will get to in a moment, the State of Missouri charged Robert Metzinger with “making a terroristic threat under [Missouri Revised Statutes] § 574.115(4). [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 3:30 am by Emily Prifogle
That these debates frequently occurred in confidential meetings inside governments suggest that officials took the law seriously, and didn’t just trot out arguments to rationalize actions that they had decided on for military reasons. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 10:15 am
And, not surprisingly, that side isn’t the federal government. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm by MOTP
The Texas high court for civil matters concludes that the Texas law at issue (Section 74.451 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code), does not squarely fall within the scope of a state law enacted to regulate the business of insurance. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:56 am by Rebecca Tushnet
, then shouldn’t a jury get to decide it and not the Sixth Circuit, given that court’s conclusion that the matter is not free from doubt? [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 6:57 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
For now, IRS does not accept Bitcoin as payment for your tax obligation – although that doesn’t mean that you can’t pay your taxes using Bitcoin. [read post]