Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 5261 - 5280
of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2024, 3:00 pm
Readers of the blog may I recall that I was counsel of record for the NRA in the Supreme Court stage of NRA v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 9:18 am
First the good: State v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:42 am
Today, the Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 9:55 am
I do think that Hershey has stated a pretty good case for a parody but that is not quite what they wanted to do here. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 9:05 pm
[James Beck and Rachel Weil, WLF; Beck, D&DL, on Redman v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 3:02 am
” And yet he and Ginsburg were the only dissenters from the Supreme Court’s 7-2 decision Monday in Gamble v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 9:00 pm
The case is Figuereo-Sanchez v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 7:24 pm
The class action lawsuit (Parent v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 7:32 am
Under the trademark laws of the United States, the first person to use a trademark has superior rights in the mark. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 12:36 am
Mercks clash over law governing coexistence dealThe Merck v Merck trade mark dispute (real name: Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp and others) has already appeared a couple of times on this weblog [see here and here], with the further honour to have a dedicated poll on who between the Germans and the Americans should have right to use that much-contended name. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 6:20 am
IPKat Mark Schweizer: Want hard answers to tough questions? [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 1:13 pm
by: Mark A. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 3:57 am
Shadi.com v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 4:58 am
Court of Justice of the EU, Bundesverband Souvenir - Geschenke - Ehrenpreise v EUIPO, C-488/16 P, at para. 38). [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 9:50 am
iCloud Communications LLC. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2018, 9:39 pm
See Golan v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
Bazarsky, The Future of PennsylvaniaProducts Liability as Applied by Federal and State Courts: Covell v. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 4:01 am
The requirements for conversion of an EUTM are set out in Article 139(2)(b) of the EU Trade Mark Regulation (EUTMR), which prohibits conversion in Member States where: "in accordance with the decision of the Office or of the national court, grounds for refusal of registration or grounds for revocation or invalidity apply to the EU trade mark application or EU trade mark. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 3:58 am
In Shapiro v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 3:17 am
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Marks and Spencer plc, heard 25 – 26 November 2013. [read post]
