Search for: "U.S. v. Sol*"
Results 5261 - 5280
of 26,981
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2020, 7:17 am
See Barnes v. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 5:01 am
Procedural Posture The U.S. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 9:55 pm
For instance, if the U.S. were to apply a 21 percent minimum tax rate, and a company had a foreign effective tax rate of 5 percent, the U.S. would be able to tax the difference between the 5 percent and 21 percent rates to collect the “tax deficit. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 2:48 am
United Technologies Corp., 487 U.S. 500 (1988). [9] See Memorandum of Law in support of Defendant General Electric Company’s Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment, in DeVries v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 6:33 pm
Co., 499 U.S. 340 (1991). [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 1:51 pm
But it hasn't been narrowed, and in U.S. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 12:18 pm
The U.S. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 9:38 am
Things seem to be looking sunny for U.S. companies. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 6:14 am
Russo, the U.S. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am
A supreme flouting of the military and industrial contexts can be found in DeVries v. [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 9:00 am
Meritor, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 8:35 am
The Petrobras settlement is the fifth largest U.S. securities class action settlement of all time. [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 5:15 am
Nathaniel Sobel and Julia Solomon-Strauss discussed the most recent developments in the Trump v. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 3:07 pm
” Appellants obtained a license from the U.S. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 6:30 am
U.S. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm
Democrats in the U.S. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 11:57 am
In Phelps v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 2:52 pm
This scenario—high-ranking officials wielding the immense power of the U.S. government without being subject to the advice and consent of the Senate—is exactly what the Founders sought to avoid when they included the Appointments Clause in the Constitution. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 12:57 pm
Under Solem v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 12:42 pm
Nathaniel Sobel and Julia Solomon Straus summarized the latest developments in Trump V. [read post]
