Search for: "Burden v. Burden"
Results 5281 - 5300
of 31,085
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of Scillia v. [read post]
6 Mar 2025, 4:00 am
In Malone-Bey v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 5:15 am
" Noting that "[a] party seeking to overturn an arbitration award bears a heavy burden and must establish a ground for vacatur by clear and convincing evidence," the Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court's decision.Citing Goldfinger v Lisker, 68 NY2d at 232-233, the Appellate Division explained that there was "clear and convincing evidence" that the arbitrator committed misconduct and that such misconduct "prejudiced the [Responent's]… [read post]
14 Jan 2025, 4:05 am
The complaint (full text) in Catholic Medical Association v. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 4:10 am
In Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawai'i, Alaska, Indiana, Kentucky, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 1:04 pm
However, there was a recent important Texas Supreme Court decision rendered in Tedder v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
Hearing officer's applying an incorrect standard in making his or her determination requires the remanding of the matter for a new hearingMcGowan v New York State & Local Police & Fire Retirement Sys., 2017 NY Slip Op 01751, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentJames K. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 11:20 am
Applying the “but-for” standard, Judge Saris dismissed OMNI Healthcare Inc. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 7:30 am
In Litzman v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 12:54 pm
In Dermody v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 4:05 am
Now, in United States v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 4:00 am
In Christian Employers Alliance v. [read post]
13 May 2021, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of Che Lin Tsao v Kelly, 28 AD3d 320 and other decisions, the Appellate Division held that Supreme Court "properly concluded that [Plaintiff] failed to meet her burden of demonstrating, by competent proof, that a substantial issue of bad faith existed warranting a hearing. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 5:01 am
A recent case, Pittman v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 6:06 am
See Andrews v. [read post]
24 Oct 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of Sekulski v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 11:00 pm
# # #DECISIONH. v Anderson & Sheppard Ltd. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 5:00 am
., 69 F.3d 1539, 1551 (11th Cir.1995) (Rule 8 does not “impose upon plaintiffs the burden to plead with the greatest specificity they can”), and Defendants will be able to obtain this information during discoveryMotion to dismiss (or for a more definite statement), denied.PK Studios, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 8:33 am
Here is one:U.S. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 6:55 am
" EMC Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
