Search for: "Does 1-35" Results 5281 - 5300 of 9,560
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2014, 4:15 am by Scott A. McKeown
While 35 USC 217(e)(1) provides a “safe harbor” allowing the generic companies the ability to develop their generic drug which by law must use the same active drug, § 271(e)(2) makes the filing of an ANDA a technical act of infringement. [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 1:23 pm
A follow-up defending the reporters’ choice of subject matter, while interesting, does not suffice. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 3:38 pm by Cicely Wilson
The court held that Article 35(1) of the Convention was clear: a claim for damages based on an injury incurred aboard an international flight must be filed within two years of the date upon which the aircraft arrived at its destination. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 12:28 pm by emagraken
Rawlins, 2010 BCSC 11. [35]      The Second Offer was made shortly before trial. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 2:00 pm by Gerry W. Beyer
In today's America, the top 1% of households owns about 35% of the nation's wealth, which is more than the entire bottom 90% does. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 7:20 pm
[…] Id. at *4 (internal citations omitted).Legal BackgroundAttorney’s fees are authorized by statute upon a district court’s finding that a case is exceptional. 35 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 3:13 am by Dennis Crouch
Adding conventional elements to an abstract idea does not render it patent-eligible. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 6:16 am by Jeff Welty
[The officer] pulled his police cruiser behind [the] defendant, who had decreased her speed to about 35 miles per hour, and activated his blue lights. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 7:36 pm by Dennis Crouch
In particular, (1) the statute does not require a full cause-of-action for infringement at the time of importation and (2) the notion that inducement is “untied” from the actual infringing article “is fundamentally flawed. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 9:06 pm
The article was created for general guidance on matters of interest only, and does not constitute legal advice. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 11:57 am by Patrick T. Ryan
  The parties’ evidence conflicted on how many customers experienced the odor problem—with plaintiffs offering evidence that it was as high as 35% and defendants countering with evidence that it was no more than 1-3%. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 8:27 am
Graco has not yet recalled its potentially affected infant seats, but the NHTSA has intimated that the following models might also be affected by the buckle problem: Snugride, Snugride 30, Snugride 32, Infant Safe Seat-Step 1, Snugride 35, Tuetonia 35, and Snugride Click Connect 40. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 8:24 pm
Id. at *8.[2] "Volatile" and "Non-Volatile" are not Indefinite, as Specification Conforms to Well-known MeaningLegal StandardUnder what is now 35 U.S.C. [read post]