Search for: "John Doe 1 " Results 5281 - 5300 of 12,912
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2021, 4:03 am by SHG
Unsurprisingly, he spoke in support of the Senate version of H.R. 1, the House’s attempt to usurp state control over their voter rules in reaction to some state’s efforts to rein in changes that facilitated voting in the last election. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 1:16 pm by WIMS
H.R. 7 does not reflect the historically bipartisan nature of the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 11:22 am by Orin Kerr
 In the three cases that did reach the merits, however, the government’s side readily won: 8-0, 8-1, and 7-2. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 8:25 am by Gabriel Chin
And whether it it’s ultimately used does not matter because the First Amendment does not require us to rely on the grace of the executive branch. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 4:39 am
After a jury found him “guilty of harassment by telephone” in violation of 720 Illinois Compiled Statutes 135/1-1 and he was “sentenced to two years' conditional discharge”, John D. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 9:29 am by Alden Abbott
Big Picture Observations: Looking Beyond the FTC-States’ Complaint The joint FTC-states complaint against Amazon does, of course, merit close reading. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:16 am by Lloyd J. Jassin
Does indemnity apply to claims and breaches? [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 2:19 pm by Keith Mallinson
” Figure 1: Overview of measures of alleged opportunistic conduct by SEP enforcers Opportunistic behavior (Table 1 sequence, Table 3 numbering) [8] Description[9](emphasis added) Rebuttal[10] 1. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 7:24 pm
Category: Claim Construction     By: John Kirkpatrick, Contributor   TitleHowlink Global LLC v. [read post]
They will argue (1) that the Fourth Amendment does not protect our phone records; (2) that there are protections in place for our privacy; and (3) that the program is necessary for our national security. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 4:01 am
The mark does not describe a "quality, feature, function, or characteristic" of the goods, and therefore it is not merely descriptive under Section 2(e)(1). [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Madison held unconstitutional a portion of Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789, which was written by Oliver Ellsworth--who was a key player at the Constitutional Convention and apparently approved of the portion of Article III with which John Marshall held Section 13 inconsistent. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 7:08 am
" Does Greg have any regrets as to how it played out? [read post]