Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 5281 - 5300
of 13,841
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2017, 4:07 am
” Briefly: At the National Conference of State Legislatures’ blog, Lisa Soronen discusses District of Columbia v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 1:44 pm
For instance, the burden onPapst is mitigated by Papst’s status as a non-practicingpatent holder residing outside the United States. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:39 pm
” (To support the nationwide injunction, Washington argued that immigration law had to be uniform; ironically, the state had opposed this exact argument in United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 9:29 pm
This drastic increase of more than 700 percent firmly secures women’s place as the fastest growing prison population and highlights the urgent need for a gender-responsive, trauma-informed approach to female incarceration in the United States. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:00 am
As the Supreme Court has stated in Larson v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 5:30 am
The disputed technology involved intrusion detection systems that Advantor originally sold certain United States Air Force bases. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
United States, a 1997 Supreme Court case holding that the federal government could not require state and local law enforcement officers to conduct background checks on gun purchasers as part of the implementation of a federal law (the Brady gun control law). [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 10:36 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 9:33 am
Developed independently by two leading research groups out of the University of California, Berkeley (“Berkeley”) and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (“MIT”), the ownership of CRISPR-Cas9 technology has lead to a patent dispute, culminating in the recent allowance of an “interference proceeding” by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 1:15 am
Many issues have been resolved over the years (at least to the extent that the parties stopped pursuing certain claims), but unless there is a surprise settlement, it could take several more years for the part relating to design patent damages to reach the point of a final ruling where all appeals have been exhausted.Yesterday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit remanded (PDF) the matter to the United States District Court for the Northern… [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 7:25 pm
Meanwhile, on February 6, the Center for Individual Rights filed a lawsuit against the state of California and the California Teachers Association on behalf of eight California public school teachers and the Association of American Educators. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 4:58 pm
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted that motion, holding that plaintiffs had not alleged falsity or materiality. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 4:49 pm
However, in doing so, the United State Bankruptcy Court in California first noted how this approach violates applicable provisions of the Civil Code, and further “opens the door to all sorts of mischief, as an HOA has no incentive whatsoever to question costs for which it is not liable and no incentive to search for services charging more reasonable costs. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 1:25 pm
” Peralta was ordered removed on June 7, 1999.Peralta returned regularly to the United States. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 10:50 am
United States. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 5:00 am
United States, was decided on July 26, 2016. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 1:00 am
On top of his experience in legal writing and academia, he has argued numerous important constitutional law cases before the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 12:44 pm
The best case in support of a due process right for a provider to challenge an assistance order is In re Application of the United States of America, 610 F.2d 1148 (3d Cir. 1979). [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 7:50 am
” (Beck v. [read post]