Search for: "United States v. Close"
Results 5281 - 5300
of 14,193
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2017, 3:44 pm
The new regulations adhere closely to Executive Order directing their creation (National Security Presidential Memorandum 5; Strengthening the Policy of the United States Toward Cuba (NSPM 5 in Federal Register) (June 16, 2017)). [read post]
28 May 2008, 1:47 pm
Section 1981, passed during Reconstruction, provides that “[a]ll persons within the jurisdiction of the United States shall have the same right to make and enforce contracts … as enjoyed by white citizens. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 5:42 am
United States, 372 U.S. 734, 737 (1963). [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 10:34 pm
Yesterday, in the case of Lindo v. [read post]
3 Nov 2006, 4:12 am
This does not imply, however, that a sentence of 21 months is unreasonably high; to the contrary, it strikes us as unreasonably low, and United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 12:25 pm
And the penultimate substantive paragraph also has this interesting discussion of the pending SCOTUS reasonableness work (background here):We pause briefly to comment on the status of this case in light of the Supreme Court's pending decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 11:43 am
The back-and-forth between the United States and China provoked a downward spiral in stock prices, and brings the countries closer to a trade war. [read post]
6 May 2022, 9:21 am
" This Court has acknowledged that "state constitutional and statutory law is subordinate to … 'the [United States] Constitution[.]'" Accordingly, the unborn plaintiffs fail to assert a legally cognizable and protected interest as persons pursuant to these repealed statutes, which are contrary to the United States Constitution as construed by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
United States, 12-223, and Pleau v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 9:28 am
Defense Distributed's efforts were initially met with opposition from the United States Department of State. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:10 am
Plaintiff is Caucasian and a Canadian citizen with Permanent Resident status in the United States. . . . [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:20 pm
United States). [read post]
6 Feb 2021, 4:45 pm
Supreme Court in South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:23 am
In P.D. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 2:46 pm
Kesselheim focused primarily on the Second Circuit’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 12:33 pm
And stop talking about how far we've come, and stop talking about how close we are. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 5:01 am
A recent case in the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, Stine, LLC v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 3:03 pm
United States (President Bident and a bunch of other named officials are also defendants).The gist of the decision is simple enough. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 6:50 am
If you want to sue state officials or state employees for constitutional violations, you can do so under 42 U.S.C. section 1983. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 6:00 am
National Australia Bank Ltd., the United States Supreme Court closed the door on plaintiffs bringing “F-cubed” cases in the United States whereby foreign investors sue a foreign issuer based upon a security traded on a foreign exchange. [read post]
