Search for: "Young v. State" Results 5281 - 5300 of 8,938
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2013, 11:36 am by Schachtman
  A political (or a religious) worldview places core commitments above empirical data, as was so clearly revealed in the case of The Vatican v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm by Ronald Collins
Answer: I stress in the book that the Roberts Court is still a “young” Court in some ways. [read post]
6 May 2013, 3:09 pm by Mark Litwak
The plaintiff, Nathan Leopold, pled guilty in 1924 to kidnapping and murdering a young boy. [read post]
6 May 2013, 6:00 am by Jon Gelman
Skin cancer is the most common form of cancer in the United States. [read post]
6 May 2013, 3:00 am by Administrator
Entertainment & Media Law SignalCorporate Sponsors Should Not be Liable for Injuries Sustained by Event Participants Recently, in Boudreau v. [read post]
4 May 2013, 12:52 pm by Kevin Goldberg
Young would win, 6-3, in the Supreme Court. [read post]
3 May 2013, 1:25 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Supreme Court Rules Against Routine Warrantless Blood Tests in DUI Cases: The Supreme Court ruled in our favor in Missouri v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:27 am by Cormac Early
Zoe Tillman of the Blog of Legal Times reports that Antoine Jones, the defendant in last Term’s GPS tracking case, United States v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 12:22 pm by Employment Lawyers
v=VIuhspnuANcRobel Phillipos, March 13, 2012If Phillipos appears small and young (he was apparently 18 when he made this video), that's because he's just a little guy. [read post]
1 May 2013, 10:27 am by The Federalist Society
 The question in the case was whether Virginia's Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) violates the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article IV and the dormant Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution by declining to grant citizens of other states the right of access to public records that Virginia affords its own citizens.In an unanimous opinion delivered by Justice Alito, the Court held that Virginia’s FOIA does not violate the Privileges and Immunities Clause… [read post]
1 May 2013, 10:27 am by The Federalist Society
 The question in the case was whether Virginia's Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) violates the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article IV and the dormant Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution by declining to grant citizens of other states the right of access to public records that Virginia affords its own citizens.In an unanimous opinion delivered by Justice Alito, the Court held that Virginia’s FOIA does not violate the Privileges and Immunities… [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:30 am by Conor McEvily
United States, a case involving the “anti-harboring” provision in Alabama’s 2011 immigration law, making it a crime to help undocumented immigrants enter or live in the state. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:48 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
Young, the Court unanimously upheld a state’s policy of restricting access to public records by out-of-state residents against challenges under the dormant Commerce Clause and the Privilege and Immunities Clause. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:46 am by Kathy Kapusta
”   Several months later, in a meeting with a company vice president, the employee stated that he felt he was still being given staff-level work. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 3:35 pm
A state may deny access to records available to its citizens pursuant to its Freedom of Information Law to individuals not citizens of that state who make a FOIL request for such records McBurney Et Al. v. [read post]