Search for: "Does 1 - 29"
Results 5301 - 5320
of 13,850
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2020, 2:43 pm
” 29 C.F.R. 1630.2(r). [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 7:00 am
Many critics have pointed out that the conditionality does not go far enough. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 8:45 pm
[1] The figure is on page 323 of Climate Change 1995 The Science of Climate Change. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 2:56 am
The German legislator made use of this right and implemented section 52 b UrhG with effect of 1 January 2008. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 10:20 am
Mar. 29, 2012). [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 12:06 pm
Id. at *1-2. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 3:07 am
Section 2(e)(1) - Mere Descriptiveness: WYHA? [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 11:11 am
Tech teasers 1. [read post]
The parol evidence rule is not a rule of evidence, even though it governs admissibility of testimony
18 Nov 2014, 6:00 pm
Bailey, 580 S.W.2d 24, 29 (Tex.Civ.App. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 5:14 am
"The decision stresses on more than one occasion that the purpose of the Enforcement Directive is to ensure a high level of protection of intellectual property rights throughout the bloc.The ruling culminates in the following short-form answer to the Munich I Regional Court's question (this is now my translation):"Art. 9(1) of Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of April 29, 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights is to be… [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 2:07 pm
She unexpectedly took leave under the FMLA, 29 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
During my recent visit to Columbia Law School, Professor John Coffee shared with me a draft of a short article that later appeared in the New York Law Journal.[1] Coffee’s article assessed the prospects in the U.S. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 1:16 pm
Her parents pursued a negligence action, but the domestic law does not provide a remedy for parents of grown-up children. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 6:54 pm
Of particular importance was s. 7, which reads: 7. (1) The following does not constitute constructive dismissal if it occurred during the COVID-19 period:1. [read post]
6 May 2021, 12:19 pm
Of particular importance was s. 7, which reads: 7. (1) The following does not constitute constructive dismissal if it occurred during the COVID-19 period:1. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 6:54 pm
Of particular importance was s. 7, which reads: 7. (1) The following does not constitute constructive dismissal if it occurred during the COVID-19 period:1. [read post]
6 May 2021, 12:19 pm
Of particular importance was s. 7, which reads: 7. (1) The following does not constitute constructive dismissal if it occurred during the COVID-19 period:1. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 9:43 am
The WHD Interpretation does not address an employee’s entitlement to take military FMLA leave for a son or daughter, which is determined by separate definitions. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 6:06 am
Piece by Kuralt 29 years ago. [read post]
