Search for: "Does 1 - 29" Results 5301 - 5320 of 13,863
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2018, 4:00 am by Sarah Sutherland
It does make sense that it’s happening now. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 1:22 pm by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-6271 Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 7:18 am by Simon Lovegrove
The approach set out in PS3/18 comes into effect from 29 March 2018. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 9:46 am by Guido Paola
The appellant lodged the appeal on the grounds of an alleged public prior use anticipating granted claim 1 and inventive step.The appellant argued that a skilled person could have easily reproduced the claimed composition starting from a product which was publicly sold before the filing date of the patent in suit.However, the BoA stated that mere public disposal of a product does not give the skilled person sufficient information on how to make that product. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 9:46 am by Guido Paola
The appellant lodged the appeal on the grounds of an alleged public prior use anticipating granted claim 1 and inventive step.The appellant argued that a skilled person could have easily reproduced the claimed composition starting from a product which was publicly sold before the filing date of the patent in suit.However, the BoA stated that mere public disposal of a product does not give the skilled person sufficient information on how to make that product. [read post]
HR typically does not have access to the detailed health record of every employee, and drug testing can only be conducted under specific circumstances. [read post]
HR typically does not have access to the detailed health record of every employee, and drug testing can only be conducted under specific circumstances. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 8:10 pm by Kevin LaCroix
It does not, Judge Lawrence said, preclude coverage for the costs incurred in defending the COF suits. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:15 am by Joel R. Brandes
The provision generally retains the present definition of dependent.[28]             The maximum amount refundable increases to and may not exceed $1,400 per qualifying child.[29] Additionally, in order to receive the child tax credit (i.e., both the refundable and non-refundable portion), a taxpayer must include [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:15 am by Joel R. Brandes
The provision generally retains the present definition of dependent.[28]             The maximum amount refundable increases to and may not exceed $1,400 per qualifying child.[29] Additionally, in order to receive the child tax credit (i.e., both the refundable and non-refundable portion), a taxpayer must include [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 2:48 pm by emagraken
The evidence does not indicate that the plaintiff took any care to determine if a left turn could be made safely. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 6:46 am by ASAD KHAN
Once that threshold is satisfied the power of detention under para 16 falls away and with it so does the power to grant bail under paras 22 or 29. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 6:46 am by ASAD KHAN
I consider that “detained” in paragraphs 22 and 29 refers to lawfully authorised detention. [read post]