Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 5301 - 5320
of 15,557
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2016, 7:00 am
Brandeis is better seen as a transitional figure between the statist Progressivism of the early twentieth century and post-World War II legal liberalism. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 5:22 am
We'll get Hobby Lobby and Harris v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 11:01 am
It will bring together Republican lawmakers; campaign strategists and right-leaning social media figures. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 12:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 4:23 pm
No facts make short opinions.United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 5:10 pm
If (God forbid) there were a Bush-v. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 6:37 am
Figurative uses. 3. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:54 am
., Serial No. 85658195 [Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusal of PERFORMANCE CLOUD for "Computer services, namely providing an online community for employers and employees to track their skills, individual development plans, succession plans, career pathing, management capability, competency assessments, employee reviews, goals, promotions, and business objections and strategy"].June 9, 2015 - 2 PM: Cinque Moda GmbH v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 2:58 am
VOLVO v LOVOL might be a case to look at more closely, though, since it raises some interesting points as to what Article 8(5) and/or conceptual similarity is meant to protect. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 3:02 pm
***************************************Another interesting General Court ruling from early October can be found in Joined Cases T-122/13, T-123/13 and T-77/13 Laboratoires Polive v OHIM, Arbora & Ausonia SLU. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 3:25 am
Seven Network Limited v Commissioner of Taxation [2014] FCA 1411, [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 1:20 pm
Luke Maunder (Bristows LLP) reports on the decision which will be interest to anyone who loves color combination trade marks or trying to figure out how to precisely and clearly ring fence the scope of trade mark protection Conference Report: Should you arbitrate FRAND rates? [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 1:42 pm
Polyglycoat Corp. v. [read post]
When Congress says "and" they mean "and." And that likely means safety-valve relief for quite a few.
18 Jun 2021, 5:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 10:10 am
Supreme Court case of Miranda v. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 8:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 4:49 pm
” Williamson v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 5:34 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 6:30 am
Through a reading of Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
26 Dec 2015, 11:13 am
There's the first amendment case Texas v. [read post]
