Search for: "In re F. E."
Results 5301 - 5320
of 7,240
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2024, 7:46 am
[W]e hold the district court committed legal error by understating the woman's interest in anonymity, appearing to announce a general rule that fairness considerations invariably cut against allowing a plaintiff to be anonymous at trial unless the defendant is also anonymous, and failing to recognize the significance of its default judgment on liability…. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
Castro v Cartwright (TTABlog) TTAB reverses 2(e)(2) refusal of PROFUMO DE FIRENZE for perfume, finding double entendre: In re Atelier Profumo Artistico Firenze SrL (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB affirms failure-to-function refusal of STRENGTH IN DATA for brochures: In re ImClone Systems Incorporated (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) r [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(Inventive Step) Copyrighting a prior public disclosure: In re Lister (IP Directions) (IP Osgoode) A closer look at requests to stay section 337 investigations pending re-examination at the USPTO (ITC 337 Law Blog) Patent prosecution tips: drafting preambles (Patently-O) US Patents - Decisions CAFC: When are subsidiaries covered in a license agreement? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(Inventive Step) Copyrighting a prior public disclosure: In re Lister (IP Directions) (IP Osgoode) A closer look at requests to stay section 337 investigations pending re-examination at the USPTO (ITC 337 Law Blog) Patent prosecution tips: drafting preambles (Patently-O) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: When are subsidiaries covered in a license agreement? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(Inventive Step) Copyrighting a prior public disclosure: In re Lister (IP Directions) (IP Osgoode) A closer look at requests to stay section 337 investigations pending re-examination at the USPTO (ITC 337 Law Blog) Patent prosecution tips: drafting preambles (Patently-O) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: When are subsidiaries covered in a license agreement? [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:15 am
I’m not going to set it all out here but the core part (from section 1) is this : (3) Behaviour is “abusive” if it consists of any of the following— (a) physical or sexual abuse; (b) violent or threatening behaviour; (c) controlling or coercive behaviour; (d) economic abuse (see subsection (4)); (e) psychological, emotional or other abuse; and it does not matter whether the behaviour consists of a single incident or a course of conduct. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 7:52 am
In re Hyundai and Kia Fuel Economy Litig., No. 15-56014, 2018 WL 505343 (9th Cir. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 7:05 am
(§ 127) New Legal Tools for Border Enforcement (Subtitle E) Amending 19 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:13 am
See In re Joint E. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:23 am
Cir. 1989), and In re Schrader, 22 F. 3d 290, 30 USPQ2d 1455 (Fed. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:38 pm
Read more… *** The Guardian Offering Julian Assange asylum in Ecuador could be an empty gesture Julian Assange asylum: questions and answers Secret court plans ‘address genuine problem in disproportionate way’ ‘As hard as it gets’: the case of anorexic E and the right to die Daniel Sokol: The judge in this challenging case relied on intuition. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 5:01 am
., 49 F. 3d 807, 818 (1st Circuit 1995). [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 11:28 am
Hyg. 3, 3 (1997). [3] See “The Dodgy Origins of the Collegium Ramazzini” (Nov. 15, 2023). [4] In re School Asbestos Litigation, 977 F.2d 764 (3d Cir. 1992). [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 3:00 am
The technology used in modern electric cars is relatively new, and they’re more expensive than diesel or petrol cars. [read post]
15 Jan 2022, 10:34 pm
Mostbet ayrıca yatırdığınız tutara göre bonuslar ve promosyonlar da sunar. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
This figure is significantly lower than in 2016, when the Delaware Court of Chancery effectively put an end to the practice of disclosure-only settlements in In re Trulia Inc. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 7:40 pm
In re The Vill. at Lakeridge, 814 F.3d 993, 1005. [read post]
26 May 2022, 8:47 am
Hood, 96 F. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am
At times, the judiciary’s resistance to delving into the factual underpinnings of expert witness opinions is extraordinary. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 6:15 pm
(iii) That the risk of the petitioner repeating the act of operating a motor vehicle while impaired by, or under the influence of, alcohol or controlled substances or a combination of alcohol and a controlled substance or repeating any other offense listed in section 303(1)(d), (e), or (f) or (2)(c), (d), (e), or (f) of the act is a low or minimal risk. [read post]
