Search for: "John Doe 4 " Results 5301 - 5320 of 7,709
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2023, 2:39 pm by Eugene Volokh
From Texas Supreme Court Justice John Devine's dissent from denial of petition for writ of mandamus today in In re Hotze: In our republican form of government, the relationship between citizens and their political representatives is sacred and constitutionally protected. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 4:19 am by David Frakt
(I do not know why the ABA website does not also list Atlanta’s John Marshall’s non-compliance letter.) [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
Second, is the justice the “swing justice” who tips the scales in the most important 5-4 cases? [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 7:52 am by Isaac Buck
The unintended consequences of the interpretation of Chief Justice John Robert’s majority opinion are not a completely novel observation. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am by CMS
  He says one of the documents, by the Prime Minister, shows the Prime Minister’s failure to understand that Parliament, as the sovereign body, may wish to ask questions of the Executive. 1435: Lord Pannick QC begins his submissions. 1429: The second Note discusses the effect of Part 4 of the interlocutor issued by the Inner House. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 2:19 pm by Lawrence Solum
Section 1983.(4) The loser pays for its own lawyer and for the winners lawyer. [read post]
17 Dec 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This distinction lies at the heart of their claim for the rise of a new racial order (4, 12, 31, 70, 75, 116). [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:51 am by Daniel Shaviro
  The author was Brigitte Madrian, presenting “Does Front-Loading Taxation Increase Savings? [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 5:29 am
On November 4, 2013, New York State Police investigator John Lombardi viewed the images from the NCMEC CyberTipline Report, confirming that these images were child pornography. . . . [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 4:55 am by Eric Segall
Although the majority opinion by Chief Justice John Roberts declared that some of the charges brought by Special Counsel Jack Smith against former President Trump must now be thrown out, it did not say whether any of the charges can go to trial. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 10:12 am
This principle does not end our inquiry, however. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 9:30 am
The case was decided by the unusual vote of 4-2, because two justices (Kagan and Sotomayor) were recused, and the case was argued before Gorsuch joined the Court. [read post]