Search for: "Key v State"
Results 5301 - 5320
of 22,458
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2013, 12:03 pm
Back in June, shortly after the groundbreaking ruling in U.S. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 7:24 am
In 2003, the United States Supreme Court established a six-factor test in Clackamas Gastroenterology Associates, P.C. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 8:20 am
Additional Resources: Williams v. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 1:01 pm
First Nathan:On several key points related to the upcoming case of Baze v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 6:17 am
In Fulton v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 2:59 pm
GoogleOn Tuesday, the Court heard oral arguments in Gonzalez v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
But Federalist 46 made it clear that state militias were key instruments of federalism, armed tools of state power and potential resistance. [read post]
28 May 2009, 3:53 am
--Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of New YorkOpinion Date: 8/22/08Cite: Pure Power Boot Camp, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:52 am
Layoff, preferred lists and reinstatement of public employees of the State as an employer and employees of its political subdivisions and schoolsSource: The Anatomy of a Layoff by Harvey Randall, Esq., Municipal Lawyer, Summer 2009, Vol. 23, No. 2, published by the New York State Bar Association, One Elk Street, Albany, NY 12207 © 2009 New York State Bar Association. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 2:52 pm
Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007) and Ashcroft v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 2:59 am
Searle v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 2:33 pm
The excerpt of Campbell included in their Book of Authorities omits the key passage at page 578 of the report that states “Nor may the four statutory factors be treated in isolation, one from another. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 12:30 pm
See United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 11:16 am
It's a definite piece of advocacy -- indeed, a well-written and well-structured one -- and while it comes in many places perilously close to affirmatively misstating the law by entirely ignoring key distinctions, I think the thing is more properly viewed as being within the permissible (and very broad) bounds of proper advocacy. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 1:10 pm
Stephens v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 2:24 pm
From Hardaway v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 4:37 am
[The State] seized several computers, external drives, and other computer-related devices from Starner's home. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 2:13 pm
 Plessey v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 6:16 am
Quila & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1482 – Read judgment A key part of the government’s strategy to combat forced marriages, preventing people under the age of 21 from entering the country to marry, has been heavily criticised by the Court of Appeal. [read post]
31 Aug 2024, 12:25 am
Ltd. and Anil Kapoor v. [read post]
